Conservative news stories suppressed on Facebook

ei.marketwatch.comMultimedia20160208PhotosMGMW-EF094_facebo_20160208162437_MG-7a198e3677817a0723bb1e5de3076d90f783104a

ei.marketwatch.comMultimedia20160208PhotosMGMW-EF094_facebo_20160208162437_MG-7a198e3677817a0723bb1e5de3076d90f783104a

Facebook has more in common with a MSM newsroom than you would think. According to a number of reports from different sources, it has shown bias against conservative news and views and deliberately altered trends to reflect what the the corporation wanted. These editorial like decisions starkly contrast with the company’s claims that their trending module only lists “topics that have recently become popular on Facebook.”

Facebook workers routinely suppressed news stories of interest to conservative readers from the social network’s influential “trending” news section, according to a former journalist who worked on the project…workers prevented stories about the right-wing CPAC gathering, Mitt Romney, Rand Paul, and other conservative topics from appearing…even though they were organically trending among the site’s users.

Several former Facebook “news curators,” as they were known internally, also told Gizmodo that they were instructed to artificially “inject” selected stories into the trending news module, even if they weren’t popular enough to warrant inclusion—or in some cases weren’t trending at all.

 …“Depending on who was on shift, things would be blacklisted or trending,” said the former curator.

…The former curator was so troubled by the omissions that they kept a running log of them at the time; this individual provided the notes to Gizmodo. Among the deep-sixed or suppressed topics on the list: former IRS official Lois Lerner, who was accused by Republicans of inappropriately scrutinizing conservative groups; Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker; popular conservative news aggregator the Drudge Report; Chris Kyle, the former Navy SEAL who was murdered in 2013; and former Fox News contributor Steven Crowder. “I believe it had a chilling effect on conservative news,” the former curator said.

…Stories covered by conservative outlets (like Breitbart, Washington Examiner, and Newsmax) that were trending enough to be picked up by Facebook’s algorithm were excluded unless mainstream sites like the New York Times, the BBC, and CNN covered the same stories.

When they were not suppressing conservative news, they artificially made popular non-conservative news.

Managers on the trending news team did, however, explicitly instruct curators to artificially manipulate the trending module in a different way: When users weren’t reading stories that management viewed as important, several former workers said, curators were told to put them in the trending news feed anyway. Several former curators described using something called an “injection tool” to push topics into the trending module that weren’t organically being shared or discussed enough to warrant inclusion—putting the headlines in front of thousands of readers rather than allowing stories to surface on their own. In some cases, after a topic was injected, it actually became the number one trending news topic on Facebook.

… “We would get yelled at if it was all over Twitter and not on Facebook,” one former curator said.

(The curators interviewed for this story worked for Facebook across a timespan ranging from mid-2014 to December 2015.)

-gizmodo.com

hqdefault

hqdefault

One of the many people I follow online is outspoken conservative commentator and comedian, Steven Crowder. He has finally had enough of censorship and suppression of conservative voices by facebook and has sent in his lawyer.

Dallas, Texas—In light of the recent allegations brought to our attention by Michael Nunez and Gizmodo.com, Steven Crowder is taking steps to determine what, if any, legal action is necessary to address the assertions that he has been targeted by Facebook for suppression due to his conservative political commentary.

The Gizmodo.com story coincides with, and now potentially provides an explanation for, Facebook’s mismanagement of payments made to Facebook by Mr. Crowder and its woefully biased and unprofessional treatment of his accounts during an ongoing billing dispute. Simultaneously, Facebook has chosen to avoid any transparency in the ongoing removal of certain political posts by Mr. Crowder, ignoring all requests for explanation of purported policy violations. These issues have been ignored by Facebook and its Legal Department despite repeated attempts to resolve the issue on his behalf. Facebook’s ongoing refusal to take action regarding their clear-cut, inexcusable financial errors has necessitated that preliminary legal steps be taken.

It is fully understood that Facebook has every right to curate any content they so desire on their platform. However, Facebook’s bullying methods of operation in tandem with both the long-standing evidence of misconduct and the allegations newly brought to light require further investigation given the direct financial ramifications on business clients acting in trust with Facebook.

As part of this investigation, a petition for pre-suit discovery has been filed in Dallas County, Texas seeking discovery from Facebook regarding the actions of its News Feed curators as well as its billing department. A copy is attached. Mr. Crowder is confident that Facebook will promptly and transparently address the request for information.

-louderwithcrowder.com

In addition to all this a group of conservatives who are sick of facebook’s alleged bias and manipulation, have created an alternative.

Screen-Shot-2013-01-31-at-5.00.53-PM-620x253

It is called the Tea Party Community.

 

 

 

 


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • Korau

    Facebook was started to cater for (and probably still sees these as it’s prime audience) 18 year old pimple factories.

    The young, newly emerged from the leftist doctrinaire organisations (school) are more likely to be sympathetic to this dogma, and it’s understandable that Facebook would cater for their audience. However, when money is involved, this completely changes the dichotomy, and the law of contracts comes into play (among others).

    It will be interesting to see how this plays out

  • Wheninrome

    The left should not be worried about the overseeing of any of our emails etc., in NZ Facebook is doing it for you, albeit from their slanted and political viewpoint.
    If the internet etc., is going to continue to be in charge of our lives and these sites are happy to take the advertising dollar then the people using them should be free to have dialogue with their friends on any subject (along as it doesn’t break the law i.e. pedophilia etc.,) wasn’t that the whole idea in the first place, keeping in touch.
    Or, was it as seems now, a political tool all along hooking people in and then controlling. That may sound far fetched, but it seem to be moving in that direction. Time for a new site, or maybe we just use a blog like WO, and allow our friends to know our “names”. After all it should only be friends who have that personal knowledge of you.

  • cows4me

    Facebook is of vital importance to the purveyors of leftist dribble and nonsense. It’s main users, legions of useful idiots, tend to be young and impressionable. Facebook’s claims of impartiality should be seen as the joke it is. Those in control realise that censorship is the only way the leftist message can stand on it’s own, they are intellectual cowards.

  • Jman

    So glad I’m one of the few people who never got into Facebook

    • Nige.

      You have a lot to be proud of. It showed promise but ended up being abused.

    • Andy111A

      I deleted my profile many years ago but it still seems to exist, not that I ever check up on it

59%