Photo of the Day

Selection_077

I remember telling Lux to make Face of the Day her own.  I used to just find a remarkable photo and put it up.  Perhaps a little description, but the photo was the star of the show.  But Lux did something to this time slot that I truly can’t live up to.

Some of you may wonder how she just always has something, every day.  So do I, frankly.  But the day has finally come where Lux is needed elsewhere for a while (she’s fine), so this slot is back on my shoulders.

I’m not even going to pretend to try and do this spot justice, so when Lux returns, I hope you’ll let her know she was missed and even though Pete’s a nice enough bloke and all that, thank goodness she’s back, etc, etc.

Because this is only going to be a few days, I thought we’d go the other way and look at some of my more favourite tinfoil hat stories.  In the mid to late 90s, I really got lost on the Internet reading all sorts of stuff.  They say the danger of an open mind is that anything can fall into it, and to be honest, I enjoyed every moment of it.

But the really fascinating thing is that the story of aliens and UFOs has made its way into the current US Presidential race.

Hillary Clinton wants to end government USO cover up

I wanted to know what Chris Mellon had to say about Hillary Clinton’s implications that the government may be withholding classified UFO documents. Backed by John Podesta, chairman of her campaign, Clinton has been speaking about the need to “get to the bottom of the UFO mystery.” Her comments are unprecedented within a presidential campaign.

Here is my recent conversation with Chris Mellon, mainly conducted via email, edited only for clarity.

Q: When did you first become interested in UFOs?

A: I was about seven years old when I saw an old-fashioned amateur movie taken by a friend of our school principal. It showed a huge, golden disc-shaped object serenely moving through sunny, blue skies, passing through cumulus clouds in a manner that would be very hard to fake. I have no idea what became of the movie, but it filled me with wonder and awe. I read everything I could get my hands on afterwards and eventually did a research project on UFOs in college for a physics professor. I remain deeply intrigued.

Q: Did your colleagues in government know you were interested in UFOs? Were you afraid of being ridiculed?

A: It was something I didn’t reveal to colleagues unless I got to know them well and we became personal friends.  Even then of course I wasn’t a nut about it and I certainly was not obsessed; it was simply a subject of great curiosity. It did not come up often. I was focused like a laser on my duties 99.9 percent of the time.

Q: Hillary Clinton has been asked about UFOs during her campaign. As the former Secretary of State, would she be likely to know if there were any classified government programs involving UFOs?

A: No, I don’t think so. I recall instances when White House officials sought briefings on highly compartmented DoD programs and were flatly refused.  Access to such programs is on a need to know basis. In general, nobody outside DoD, including the Secretary of State, is deemed to have a need to know. Officials like John Podesta and Secretary Clinton can easily serve for years in senior positions and be avid consumers of classified intelligence analysis but never obtain access to DoD’s compartmented programs, which mostly relate to new weapons systems. Information about such programs rarely leaks because it doesn’t circulate, unlike the constant stream of leaked information regarding classified intelligence activities.

 

2016-05-08-1462729057-2025640-ChrisandBill5.jpeg

 

Chris (right) with former Secretary of Defense Bill Cohen in 1995. Note the inscription: “The Other Man who kept all the secrets.” Chris drafted the bill for Cohen that established the US Special Operations Command.

 

photo © Chris Mellon

 

Q: Do you think that if Clinton is elected we can expect to learn new information about UFOs?

A: I highly doubt DoD or any other government agency is concealing UFO information. I participated in a comprehensive review of DoD’s black programs and spent over a decade conducting oversight of the national foreign intelligence program, an almost totally separate world of secrets. I visited Area 51 and other military, intelligence and research facilities. During all those years, I never detected the faintest hint of government interest or involvement in UFOs.

Q: Clinton and John Podesta have been focusing on the need for de-classifying government documents. What do you think about that?

A: While a few new, previously overlooked documents might turn up (the bureaucracy is never perfect), I do not believe they would resolve the UFO issue or provide significant new insights. I can think of one lengthy UFO report that is classified only due to concerns over sources and methods. In fact, it identified a convincing conventional explanation for the pilot sightings in this particular case. There are lots of classified documents related to activities at Area 51, where high security is needed. But this is all legitimate stuff the American people would support. They have nothing to do with UFOs, to the best of my knowledge.

Q: Do you recall any incidents involving UFOs while you were in government?

A: Yes, there were a handful of incidents.  Knowing of my interest in UFOs, a breathless naval aviator called me one day to report that he was present minutes earlier when a Navy jet landed after being circled by a UFO in broad daylight. The Navy did not pursue the issue as far as I could tell. I also recall the Maui Optical Tracking Facility, which tracks satellites, recording a flight of four or five fiery UFOs traversing the night sky.  Nobody knew what to make of it. But no government official expressed the slightest interest even after the tape was featured on ABC’s Nightline.  I found the utter lack of scientific curiosity due to political correctness highly frustrating.

Q: How do you think the press and public will react if Clinton is elected, makes the inquiries she promised, but comes up empty-handed?

A: I think the conspiracy theorists will be angry and unconvinced, while the general public may conclude UFOs are not a worthwhile topic. If Clinton really wants to get to the bottom of the UFO issue, I think she should officially task NORAD with collection and analysis responsibility. Simultaneously, she should assign the Office of Science and Technology Policy the job of reviewing available evidence, coordinating with other countries and providing scientific assessments and recommendations.

Q: The taboo against taking UFOs seriously is a huge problem. How can we get more government officials to change this ingrained attitude?

A: I think we have to ask ourselves a key question, and then bring it forward. “Are there UFO cases that are sufficiently well-documented to warrant a scientific investigation of the phenomenon?” In my view, the answer is yes.

The patterns in the data are too strong; the reports from credible witnesses separated widely by time and place too similar; the evidence from videos and trained military and law enforcement observers too extensive; and the independent radar data in select cases correlates too highly with visual observations to safely ignore. Finally, when someone you trust and respect, like a naval aviator, looks you in the eye and tells you he saw something truly extraordinary at close range, it’s hard not to take his testimony seriously. It is arrogant, unreasonable and unwise to dismiss such reports. We should simply and impartially follow the trail wherever it leads.

Q: Which credible UFO incidents have you found particularly impressive and convincing?

A: A few stand out in my mind. In November 1989, 13 police officers and hundreds of other witnesses saw two silent triangular craft gliding over Belgium. This was the beginning of a wave of sightings there lasting well over a year. Ground and air radar data were acquired as well. The Belgian Air Force investigated the events in cooperation with a team of scientists and consulted with the U.S. and NATO countries, but could not find a conventional explanation.

 

2016-05-08-1462727551-4429314-DB29NovoriginalA.jpeg

 

An artist’s rendition of the Belgium UFO that made repeated visits in 1989-90

 

2016-05-08-1462727932-8377390-INSERTpressConf11Jul1990.jpeg

 

Colonel Wilfried De Brouwer, who later became a general, presents anomalous radar readings at a 1990 press conference during the Belgian wave

 

On the night of March 30, 1993, over a hundred witnesses in England, including police officers and military personnel, saw a triangular-shaped craft able to rapidly accelerate in seconds from a hovering position. The British Ministry of Defense stated that “none of the usual explanations put forward to explain UFO sightings seem applicable” and concluded that the evidence showed that “an unidentified object (or objects) of unknown origin was operating over the UK.”

Similarly, multiple police officers in Southern Illinois saw an object in January 2000 that looked and behaved very similarly to the Belgian and British UFOs. In fact, the Illinois police officers’ drawings of the craft are uncannily similar to the depictions of triangular craft produced by Belgian law enforcement officers a decade earlier, as well as many others since.

 

2016-05-08-1462739196-8484924-004.jpeg

 

A Belgian Air Force weather forecaster drew his sighting in 1990

 

© SOBEP archives

 

In 2006, pilots and airport personnel witnessed a disc-shaped object hovering over O’Hare airport for over five minutes, yet no government investigation was undertaken.

And, while most sightings have conventional explanations, I think it is stunning how many reports come in regularly to groups like MUFON, with impressive detail, including photos or videos.  I often hear from skeptics, “If UFOs are out there how come nobody ever gets a video with all the smartphones around?”  That is ignorant, it happens all the time!

Q: Some people believe the more recent sightings in cases such as those you mentioned may simply be US government tests of experimental aircraft. Is that possible?

A: I can understand why this may seem the most plausible explanation. But I can assure you, those objects did not belong to US Department of Defense. Just before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, I was contacted by the DoD Office of Congressional Affairs. They were in a tizzy because Robert Byrd, the powerful Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, was challenging them over reports appearing in magazines such as Aviation Week and Space Technology describing an alleged super-secret US aircraft program dubbed “Aurora.”

Senator Byrd would use his budget power to punish the department severely if we lied to him or withheld information. We pursued all possible options, double-checking with the appropriate officials while reminding them of the imperative of providing an accurate response. We quickly confirmed what we already knew – that while there are always things on the drawing board, there was nothing remotely resembling such aircraft being operated by the department. We had nothing with the capacity to hover and then silently accelerate at massive speeds.

Also, it is totally uncharacteristic of the US military to conduct experimental tests of new vehicles over populated areas where security would be compromised and innocent civilians placed in harms way. That’s completely contrary to military DNA. Alien visitation is actually easier to believe than that level of stupidity being exhibited by the brilliant people developing new aircraft technologies for DoD.

Q: Are you certain there is no government cover-up?

A: It’s impossible to prove the negative, so all I can say is that I never saw any evidence of official interest in UFOs. I’d love to believe we have a crashed saucer somewhere, but I’ve never seen anything remotely supportive of such incredible claims. In my experience, on those rare occasions when UFO incidents involving the government occur, they are highly inconvenient, awkward and embarrassing for the afflicted government officials who want nothing more than to put the issue behind them as quickly as possible! The military seems generally unwilling to investigate even when UFO reports come from our own military pilots or officials in high office such as Fife Symington, the former governor of Arizona.  Senior officials are so fearful of being ridiculed that they conceal any expression of interest or curiosity.

Q: Some inside sources have proposed that retrieved hardware from a UFO may exist within a private aerospace company which has become independent from the DoD.  In this way, it would be exempt from government oversight and known only to a few people. Do you think this is possible?

A: I find it hard to imagine something as explosive as recovered alien technology remaining under wraps for decades. So while I have no reason to believe there is any recovered alien technology, I will say this: If it were me, and I were trying to bury it deep, I’d take it outside government oversight entirely and place it in a compartment as a new entity within an existing defense company and manage it as what we call an “IRAD” or “Independent Research and Development Activity.”

Q: So where does this all leave us, and what is to be done?

A: In my view, calling for the end to an alleged government UFO cover-up is almost certainly a dead end, and does not help inspire anyone in government to become more open to the topic. The UFO mystery is a scientific problem. A true scientist seeks and follows the data no matter how politically incorrect the facts may be. The greatest scientific breakthroughs occur when we verify information that challenges conventional wisdom. That’s why I joined the board of UFODATA.

– Pete, drawing content from Leslie Kean, Huffpost
 


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • BR

    Meanwhile, here’s something to fill in the blanks:

    http://www.oakislandmoneypit.com/

    • Chinaman

      Totally agree cows4me,the U.S started anti-gravity research in the late 40`s early 50`s,there were articles about it in magazines like popular mechanics etc of the time…it also happened to be when all of the ”sightings” started happening.

      One theory is that a lot of the science for the project came from Nicola Tesla who died in 1943.He lived in the Waldorf hotel in New York and when he died his papers were confiscated from his his safe in his room by the FBI.

      You only need a cursory knowledge of Tesla to understand the technology that is being withheld from the general population.

      • BR

        Nonsense. There is nothing mysterious about anything Tesla did. The
        physics of electromagnetism are completely described in Maxwell’s
        equations. Tesla invented AC motors and transformers. He also
        demonstrated the Tesla coil which was basically an AC current to voltage
        converter, or transmission line transformer.

        Bill.

        • Chinaman

          Bill,
          Have you read any of the biographies about Tesla?

          Lots of ”mysteries” included like..

          His experiments at Colorado Springs with a giant Tesla coil into wireless transmission of power.

          The ”mysterious” Wardenclyffe tower built in New York

          The ”mystery” of his missing papers,his best biographer Margaret Cheny said in regard the papers that they could not be talked about due to secrecy laws in the U.S.

          The ”mystery” of how now he is a pretty much forgotten man compared to the likes of Edison and Bell.

          • BR

            The wireless transmission of usable power over long distances would be inefficient and utterly impractical. Tesla was way off the track when he came up with this idea. The losses and wastage would be horrendous. It has never been done in any efficient or practical way. The physics don’t allow it.

            Bill.

          • Chinaman

            Bill you say ”the physics don`t allow it”

            Funny thing this is exactly what Tesla`s professor when at university in Prague told him about his ideas about AC/DC and induction motors.

            The professor was wrong and the world still pretty much runs on Tesla`s massive breakthrough with the AC/DC system today that is hardly changed from his original concept in the late 19thC.

            Do your self a favour Bill and have a proper read of what Tesla did in his lab in Colorado Springs and what his plans were with the Wardenclyffe tower…you might get a surprise.

          • BR

            One of Tesla’s major breakthroughs was to come up with a way to convey significant quantities of power over long distances USING WIRES.

            It is you who need to “have a proper read” as clearly you do not understand the physics associated with electromagnetism and the difference between power and radio transmission. It’s boring I know, but if you make the effort you will become wiser and better informed.

            Bill.

  • cows4me

    It would be very silly not to believe the US military industrial complex is not doggie deep into UFO’s. To say, what we see is what we get, is treating us like children. Most military aviation technology is at least several decades old before the general public gets to see it so it’s not hard to believe they are far more advanced than what they would want us to know about.

40%