London’s new Mayor is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma

 

The anti Israel mainstream media seem as confused by Sadiq Khan as I am. Like a typical labour politician he has immediately made an issue of gender equality by appointing women to three top roles.

Khan — who promised to “put the fight for gender equality” at the heart of his mayoralty — had already announced his statutory deputy is Joanne McCartney, meaning three of his four deputies are women. 

What has bamboozled the media and confused me is his apparent support for Israel. The media support the vicious BDS movement which has cost so many Palestinians their jobs. They cannot understand why Khan would support Israel. If a non-Muslim mayor had done this the press would have ripped him apart but because he is Muslim they are caught between a rock and a hard place. No reporter wants to be accused of racism or Islamophobia, since that is exactly what Khan’s opposition was accused of in the lead up to the election.
What really amuses me is the reporter’s concern that he is not being ‘ inclusive, ‘ because her idea of being inclusive is supporting Muslims not pro-Israel Jews. It is only okay to support minority rights if they are Muslims is the message I get from her article.

What I want to know, is whether Khan is genuinely pro-Israel or whether this is a political attempt to improve the Labour party’s image, given the anti-Semitic scandal that has so recently rocked them? He really is an enigma. One thing I do feel certain of is his ambition. Sadiq Khan has his eye on the leadership of the Labour party and the way he is going he just might achieve it

…A few weeks into his mandate and the politician continues to enjoy positive coverage from a normally hostile press.

Yet for all the personal  praise he attracted as a result of his victory – it was described as historic – his first acts in office reveal another side to the man.

When his candidacy was first announced back in September, the Tooting MP insisted his campaign and consequent term in office would be focused on the issues that mattered to London. He said  international issues such as the Palestine-Israel conflict would not feature in his programme.

Yet a week after being chosen as the Labour Party’s candidate, Sadiq Khan gave an interview to the Daily Mail where he outlined his plan to support a festival showcasing  Tel Aviv. He vowed  to oppose the initiative launched to oppose Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestinian land – the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS).

He also stated that his party leader Jeremy Corbyn’s attempts to engage with Palestinian and Lebanese organisations such as Hamas and Hezbollah would turn London into a potential terror target. It rapidly emerged that what he meant when he said that he refused to be drawn into foreign affairs was that he refused to acknowlege the Palestinian narrative in the Middle East.

Siding with the Israeli narrative , and what it does and stands for, was obviously going to make life safer for a prospective mayor of London.

…While his leader failed to rein him in, London’s Muslims  became increasingly divided  over his one-sided and increasingly divisive discourse.

Desperate to court one tranche of the electorate, he  blatantly neglected another.

…At a time when Islamophobic attacks are on the increase and hijab-wearing women are primary targets, Khan painted them as “suspicious” and alien to the London he was familiar with…

Had similar statements been uttered by any other candidate, accusations of Islamophobia and bigotry would have been flying. Instead, media coverage focused on the racist campaign of his opponent Zac Goldsmith , which turned Khan into a victim.

Many factors played into Khan’s comfortable victory.

For one thing, many saw in a vote for Khan a means to support Jeremy Corbyn, who was by the time of the mayoral election bogged down in a fabricated scandal over anti-Semitism in the Labour Party.

…In the run-up to the elections, Khan told the Jewish Chronicle that his commitment to Israel could not be challenged.

A worrying statement if ever there was one. The Jewish electorate, relatively small in number, is  split over the issue of Israel and many London Jews would recoil at the idea of being associated with a state that is in violation of 67 UN resolutions.

…The ambitious Khan was in fact never really courting the “Jewish” vote which is relatively small, but rather the pro- Israel lobby which is embedded in the highest echelons of Britain’s political establishment.

Sadiq Khan realised which side his bread was buttered on and decided to court one lobby at the expense of the vast majority of his voters.  His first official engagement as Mayor of London was alongside the former face of Israel’s operation Cast Lead, Mark Regev, a face many Holocaust survivors or their descendants would deplore being associated with.

Khan, who made his father’s profession a major feature in his campaign maintained that his working-class credentials – he is the son of a bus driver in case anyone missed this – would make him the “inclusive” mayor par excellence.

Yet when the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) invited him to an event commemorating the Nakba or catastrophe, marking the expulsion and ethnic cleansing in 1948 of Palestinians, Khan  ignored it.

Perhaps  more revealing  was his response to a question from a listener to a radio show he was on. Asked why he had ignored the PSC’s invite despite claiming to be an inclusive mayor, he launched an interminable explanation about attending a Holocaust memorial ceremony.

…forces one to ask serious questions about Khan’s ability to be London’s “inclusive” mayor simply by virtue of being from an ethnic minority.

Time and again Khan has openly sided with Israel to the detriment of the Palestinians, whose cause Londoners have been increasingly supportive of.

As the anti-Semitism/anti-Zionism row continues to rock the Labour Party, one thing at least has emerged since May’s election: you do not have to be Jewish to be Zionist, in fact, you can be a Muslim too. Mayor Khan is the proof of this.

– Hafsa Kara-Mustaphais a journalist, political analyst and commentator with a special focus on the Middle East and Africa.

-middleeasteye.net

 


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • RealKiwi

    As the saying goes ” Only Nixon Can Go To China”

  • JC

    Fascinating.. I don’t know enough about the man to comment on his views but I assume his support for Israel is political.

    What it might mean is something like the “Shy Tory” effect, ie more support among the population for Israel than appears on the surface.

    JC

  • Aucky

    London has a large, wealthy and influential Jewish population and whilst they did not get their own preferred candidate, Zac Goldsmith across the line Khan has little to lose and much to gain by extending the hand of friendship. London’s Jews and Muslims have co-existed for generations.

  • Kevin

    Hilarious. I can just imagine the journalist, Hafsa Kara-Mustapha, jumping up and down and throwing a major tanty.

    I think Sadiq Khan is legit and proven that he’s one of us. We don’t have to anything to worry about. It looks like he’ll make a good mayor for London.

    • Isherman

      I tend to think so too, or at least, for the time being I give him the benefit of the doubt. My main regret, even though it was never likely to happen, is Khan not accepting Trumps challenge to a public IQ test. I know where my money would have gone, and it wouldn’t be on trump. In fact, I had wondered if some anti Trump Republicans had quietly got in touch with Khan and implored him to take it up…that would have been hilarious I think.

  • R&BAvenger

    I was skeptical at first, but his interview with Christiane Amanpour was interesting. His comments on the veil/ muslim women’s dress along with his first act as London Mayor were revealing.

    I was wondering if he was simply tailoring his responses to the expected audience, but at present think he should be given the benefit of the doubt and be judged on his actions as mayor, not juts his words.

    Video of interview here:
    http://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2016/05/11/london-intv-amanpour-sadiq-khan.cnn

    His first act as mayor? To visit a Holocaust memorial service with the Jewish Community.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3579714/Sadiq-Khan-attends-Holocaust-memorial-act-Mayor-London-day-Labour-mayor-repeated-controversial-claims-Hitler-Zionist.html

    • Observer

      Sounds like he’s a political realist and knows that Labour UK has to distance itself from the kind of scandal that dogged his campaign.

  • yoyoyo

    it could be a case of “keep your friends close but your enemies closer”

    So lets give him the benefit of doubt but cautiously observe what happens when the honeymoon is over…

    in general a “leopard doesn’t change its spots…”

    • Isherman

      But more likely the sort of political pragmatism that I suspect he possesses. The same publication (thejc.com) in March 2016 carried his thoughts behind opposing the BDS movement. Quite simply, he stated that the boycott movement will do absolutely nothing to advance peace, and the example of the Sodastream boycott served only to adversely effect workers, nothing more. He personally believes in a two state solution, and simply see’s no upside in completely turning away from or against Israel. And in those thoughts, which I believe are genuine, he’s quite right.

      • yoyoyo

        I will reserve judgement. It could be pragmatism or playing the system and saying the right things to further his position.

        He is right about the incompatibility of the two ways of life but likely thinks one should take over the other.

        Not usually a conspiracy theorist but this concerns me.

  • Seriously?

    Maybe he is the sort of person that has religious beliefs, but doesn’t let them rule his life. It is a backdrop to their views of the world, not determinative.

    Christianity has plenty of people like that, and Islam needs more of them.

  • Superman

    How refreshing. Let’s see how he goes. Interesting how the Israel haters refer to anyone who supports Israel as a Zionist and how it totally throws them when a Muslim expresses anything positive about Israel.

  • Johnno

    I understand the mayor of Rotterdam in the Netherlands also have a Muslim mayor, Ahmed Aboutaleb, and he seems to be doing a pretty good job. He is very critical of muslim extremism and tells muslim migrants that they must respect the laws of the EU or go home if they do not like the freedom. He has apparently used some pretty strong language on TV, which cannot be repeated here since it would contravene moderation rules.

    https://euobserver.com/justice/131790

48%