Paul Little seems…uhm…ahh…err…’confused’

Paul Little has a rage in the Herald on Sunday about monopolies, triggered by the proposed merger of his employer NZME. with Fairfax.

When the all-but-inevitable merger of media companies NZME and Fairfax was announced, journalistic reaction fell into two camps. Those with secure jobs regretfully accepted that it was probably for the best in the long run. Those without security of tenure heard the bicycle bell of the Newspaper Boy of the Apocalypse.

Some members of the public lamented yet another kick in the guts of journalism, and many more worried about possible effects on their daily diet of Naz and Jordan.

Whatever else this merger is, and whatever its results in terms of the information we get, it is part of a seemingly unstoppable trend towards monopoly in all areas of commerce.

Sky is a monopoly and yet it got reamed last night with the boxing. Monopolies have a habit of dying too…remember when the US government took Microsoft to court using anti-trust legislation. The government took more than 10 years to stop something they didn’t like in 1995, but it took the internet less than 5 years to remove Microsoft’s monopoly.

Which is funny because Paul Little blames the ultimate is distributed control, the internet, for the creation of monopolies.

[I]n everything from retailing to computing, single names dominate their markets.

Blame the internet. The worldwide web has abolished space and time. Companies can take and supply digital orders any time from anywhere.

Distracted by the potential of this brave new world, we have allowed this trend to sneak up on us. No one questions why, although there are many search engines, only Google has become a verb.

Globally there is one online auction site in most countries – New Zealand is the odd one out with Trade Me apparently too dominant to let eBay in.

You might think you’re on to something if you’ve been getting around without the help of Google Maps and recently switched to GPS navigation system Waze which, among other points of difference warns you of upcoming cops and red-light cameras. You might also be surprised to know Google has owned it since 2013.

Google also owns the online video sharing/piracy website YouTube, which has 75 per cent of that market.

I’m not sure Google will take kindly to Paul Little describing Youtube as a piracy website. I hope Paul Little never discovers that Waze is an Israeli company, staffed by ex-soldiers who developed the software for the IDF.

The raging continues.

Meanwhile, non-digital companies are extending their dominance too, also often in disguise. That folksy soft drink or fruit juice or flavoured water with its “aw shucks” yarn on the label and antiquated type face is as likely to be owned by the Coca-Cola company as anyone else.

Although here are lots of sites where you can buy books online, most people would name Amazon which, in 2013, bought Goodreads, the immensely popular site on which “real” people share their opinions of books. When Book Depository appeared with international free and rapid delivery and cheaper prices, many rejoiced. Amazon bought Book Depository in 2013. No wonder people have gone back to bookshops.

It’s impossible to under-estimate Amazon’s reach or ambition – it now sells food, clothing and just about anything else you might need, and in some areas in the US promises two-hour delivery.

Social media? Facebook bought Instagram in 2012, and with Twitter shares at an all-time low, it is poised for purchase.

So what? I’m missing the point here, I think. Are people really returning to bookshops? I only went in one yesterday because the missus was looking for ideas to download on her Kindle. I can’t remember the last time I went into a book shop.

But are monopolies bad? With economies of scale and centralisation, they can keep prices down and develop services without wasting time and effort on fending off competitors.

Well they could, but most monopolies put their obligation to make a profit before any other aim. There’s no one to stop them in an increasingly liberal regulatory environment.

So it’s no surprise these trends are occurring in tandem with the greatest increase in the wealth gap the world has ever known.

There are ways to stop monopolies…change the market. That’s what happened to Microsoft. Software went to the cloud, the desktop dominance was dead almost overnight. Licensing, which was previously extortionate, became small monthly payments. The distribution model, the sale model, the development model changed almost overnight and the market leader became the also ran.

Nokia and Motorola were dominant in the mobile market until Apple changed the market. Their near monopolies were gone overnight. Blackberry suffered the same fate, and all with the delivery of the first iPhone.

You might think Apple dominates the cellphone industry now…and you’d be wrong. Samsung sells way more handsets than Apple and has done for at least 10 years. Monopolies can and are challenged.

But myopic idiots like Paul Little always bemoan the changes.

This column is utterly confusing. I read it twice to discover is there was a point to it, and found that there wasn’t.

I am starting to think that Paul Little is the Herald’s “special” quota.

 

– Herald on Sunday

 


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.

38%