Tolley: giving money and food away doesn’t solve the problem

The churches are politicking again. Perhaps it is time to look, once again, at their status.

As usual the Media party take their side despite clear contradictions between the claims made and the facts in the report.

The government is dumping responsibility for desperate people on the charitable sector, say New Zealand’s Christian social services.

A new report from the NZ Council of Christian Social Services, released today, says demand on social service organisations has soared, while government support has shrunk, particularly in the form of food grants.

Read the full report online here

Executive officer Trevor McGlinchey said like many of the people they served, social service organisations were under huge financial stress, with government funding staying largely static for the last eight years.

Desperation to find housing, food and sufficient income to survive had become “the new normal” for many families, he said.

Except their own reports states otherwise.

There was “a real contradiction” between government support and the experience of organisations working at the front-line.

More and more people were relying on food parcels from community food banks, yet Work and Income’s special needs grants for food decreased by 28 percent between December 2009 to December 2015.

The report also found that in the same period, Housing New Zealand waiting lists dropped from over 10,000 to 3500, even while overcrowding and homelessness increased, and emergency housing providers were being swamped with people asking for help.

“Government has relied too heavily on the response of community organisations, charities and service providers to meet the needs of those with the least in our communities,” Mr McGlinchey said.

“Government must provide greater income to poor families, whether they are in work or on a benefit.”

We have more people than ever before in work in New Zealand, and one of the lowest levels of unemployment in the OECD, but still the pricks want more and more money. The Housing stats are interesting. The opposition are going on about a housing crisis yet it appears the crisis was some years ago.

Anne Tolley isn’t having a bar of it.

A spokesman for the Social Development Minister Anne Tolley said food grants peaked in 2010 at the height of the Global Financial Crisis and were now at “similar levels” to 2011. While the number of applications had declined, the percentage granted had increased, he said.

“As far as community investment is concerned, we invest over $330 million of taxpayer money in the social services sector – and there is little evidence it is effective in helping vulnerable people which is why we are revamping the system through the community investment strategy to ensure it is targeted and results-based, and that it makes a real difference for those who need support the most.

“On top of this funding, Budget 2016 invested an additional $347 million as part of the overhaul of care and protection for vulnerable young people and $46 million for a new nationwide system to support victims of sexual abuse system, while the $790 million child material hardship package in Budget 2015 represented the first rise in benefits for 43 years.”

This is the problem with these womble organisations. They always think more money is the answer, but they never mention outcomes or results. The government, quite rightly, is wanting results for the millions. If there is no discernible improvement then it is sensible to look for other ways.

 

– RadioNZ


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.

59%