Email of the day

I’ve decided to give voice to some good emails that I periodically receive.

This one came in yesterday.

A recent statement issued by the Human Rights Commission is calling out the use of “the ‘N’ word” as not OK in New Zealand. Putting aside the arguments about free speech and the right to be offended, made on WhaleOil in numerous places – let’s agree with the HRC that certain words should be banned and that making some comments is just “not how we roll”. That would be fine if Dame Devoy was consistent.

She says clearly in the release “it’s important for New Zealanders to talk about what is acceptable and what isn’t”. However, she wanted no debate about banning Christmas. She couldn’t even respond to Lindsay Perigo when he gave a speech about what was acceptable from Kiwi Muslims. The Dame of squash says one thing and does another.  

If it’s so important to talk about what’s acceptable and what isn’t, why has there been no discussion from the HRC on the hateful BDS movement? Why hasn’t Dame Devoy come out and said anything at all about the Muslims who were arrested on charges of having violent ISIS material in their possession and threatening to kill Kiwis? Where is the HRC statement standing with the Kurdish community instead of only with the Federation of Islamic Associations? What is the HRC doing to understand if a large proportion of the NZ Muslim community also think that terror attacks are justified (like European Muslims)? Why does Dame Devoy continue to tell us that terrorism has NOTHING to do with religion?

It seems there is one standard for Muslims and another for the rest of us when it comes to the HRC. If they were honest about it we might have reason to respect the organisation more but as it stands, pure hypocrisy deserves no respect. The office should be dismantled and the Dame should go back to hitting a small ball in a box – she was very good at that.

Once you start banning words it doesn’t take long before ideas are banned too.

This sort of nonsense must be fought at every turn.

We need to return to our ability to speak freely.


– tipline

Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.