What a good idea, criminal bludgers to have their benefits docked

Mark Mitchell has proposed that criminal bludgers have their benefits docked if they don’t comply with court orders.

Concerns have been raised about a new bill that could see benefit payments cut for offenders who breach their community sentences.

Parliament’s Social Services Committee is currently calling for public submissions on the the Social Security Amendment Bill, which was put forward by National MP Mark Mitchell.

The bill would allow Corrections to have benefit payments for offenders stopped if they continued to disregard written warnings to comply with their community sentences.

Offenders serving community sentences are on probation, which means they are able to serve their sentences in the community but with restrictions on their movements.

Some organisations are worried about the impact the bill could have, and have questioned if it will only drive offenders to re-offend.

Surprisingly the Sensible Sentencing Trust is upset about this.

Manawatu-based Sensible Sentencing Trust spokesman Scott Guthrie said he would oppose the bill because people needed to be able to live.

“It doesn’t matter if you’re a criminal or not,” he said. “If we do that we’re going to see an increase in the crime rate.

“If people have no money they are going to steal stuff.”

The bill would allow for offender with children to only have their benefits cut by 50 per cent, but Guthrie said any cuts to someone supporting a child was not an option.

“If they are going to cut the benefit by 50 per cent there is no way one adult and one child can live on that.

“That’s just laughable.”

Actually, no. What is laughable is our catch and release justice system and criminals thumbing their nose at court orders.

Predictably the crim-huggers are upset.

Roger Brooking, an alcohol and drug counsellor in Wellington, said the bill was creating a “recipe for disaster”.

“There is all kinds of reasons why offenders don’t comply.”

Brooking said he had heard offenders complain that their probation officers were not there to help, but were always there to tell them off if they did anything wrong.

“It alienates offenders from their probation officers.”

Holding down a job was something that was often difficult for offenders, he said.

All sorts of reasons? Yeah, like they are ratbags and criminals.

I think this is a  good idea. The alternative of course is to return the scumbags to jail.


– Fairfax

Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.