Why do the taxpayers own farms?

I’m waiting for the howls of outrage from the Labour party over the performance of Landcorp.

Landcorp has recorded a net profit after tax of $11.5 million, largely thanks to a $7.4m profit on land sales.

The state-owned enterprise, which Finance Minister Bill English earlier this year described as a “poor investment” although the Government had no intention to sell it off, reported a net operating loss of $9.4m on revenue of $209m for the year ended June 30, 2016.

For the second year in a row it will not pay a dividend to the Government.

Landcorp chief executive Steven Carden said the result reflected higher livestock valuations, a $7.4m profit on land sales,and lower milk revenue. Milk revenue had dropped $12.9m as the payout fell to its lowest level for 10 years.

They will no doubt blame the minister for a shabby performance.

But, you have to ask why it is that the taxpayer owns farms in the first place?

Green spokeswoman for Primary Industries Eugenie Sage said the result underlined the wisdom of diversifying away from commodities.

If agriculture was covered by the emissions trading scheme, it was likely some of Landcorp’s land would be best planted in forestry, she said.

Perhaps diversification by selling it off would work better.

Farming is a high-risk business prone to the vagaries of weather and international markets. Labour, of course, believes that once the government owns something it should be kept in public ownership beyond the assets useful life or purpose.

Meanwhile, the red ink flows and the government gets nothing for its “investment”.

Time to swing the axe, I’d start with Landcorp, then RadioNZ and TVNZ.

 

-Fairfax


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to Podcasts?
  • Access to Political Polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.

41%