Privacy vs Terrorism… in New Zealand

Under the new rules, coming into force 1 November, banks will be required to give details of international transfers above $1000, and any cash transactions within New Zealand above $10,000 dollars.

The rules are being applied under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009, after regulations were passed in November defining the amount of money that would require banks to disclose transfer details.

The details will include include the customer’s name, address, phone number, and IP address.

Police said more than $1.5 billion is laundered through New Zealand bank transfers each year.

Bankers’ Association chief executive Karen Scott-Howman said banks strike a delicate balance between protecting their customers, and helping police.

“We support the policy aim of fighting money laundering and terrorist financing, it’s pretty hard not to, but we always have the interest of our customers at the forefront and want to make sure that that balance is struck correctly.

Wellington privacy lawyer Katrine Evans, said the new rules gave police a lot of information and power – which they would have to use responsibly.

“We need to be sure that these new rules are necessary and that they’re actually effective,” she said.

It’s a blunt tool.  The $1.5 billion won’t be laundered by 99.99% of the population, yet we all fall under the same requirements.

$1000 for international transfers is a ridiculously low threshold.  It’s going to catch anyone sending back money to the islands, the Philippines or even just gifts or assistance to family overseas.



Do you want:

  • ad-free access?
  • access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • access to Incite Politics magazine articles?

Silver subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March.

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.