No, but he leaked secrets for a glad eye

via righttolife.co.nz

Peter Dunne wouldn’t have approved Peter Thiel’s citizenship:

Peter Thiel seems to have gotten his timing bang-on.

The controversial billionaire, a backer of US President Donald Trump, was granted New Zealand citizenship in 2011 by special grant.

He was far from meeting the eligibility criteria, having only visited the country for 12 days in the five years prior – 1338 days less than the normal requirement.

But then-internal affairs minister Nathan Guy granted him citizenship anyway, using a “public interest” exception built into the law.

Guy stood by his decision – calling Thiel a “great ambassador” for New Zealand despite the fact that he kept his citizenship completely secret for six years – but the new minister doesn’t agree.

Speaking to TVNZ on Sunday, current Internal Affairs Minister Peter Dunne said he wouldn’t have given citizenship to Thiel.

“I wasn’t the minister at the the time – on the basis of the information I’ve seen, the answer is probably no,” said Dunne.

He said special circumstances applications came to his desk from time to time.

“You deal with each one on its merits. All I’m saying is that on the basis of the public information that I’ve seen I probably would have taken a different decision.”

He might not have approved Thiel’s citizenship but we do know that (nudge, nudge, wink, wink) he’ll leak documents for a glad eye.

 

-Fairfax


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

41%