Soper on Turei

Things turned to crap for the self-confessed fraudster Metiria Turei when she and her coven turned on Barry Soper and hissed at him, literally, for daring to ask some pertinent questions.

The media have locked in behind the veteran, and now he has written a column what her admission of fraud could turn into for her.

The twitterati has become apoplectic, fuming at the audacity of anyone posing a provocative question to the patron saint of the poor Metiria Turei.

Why would be want to know whether the father of the child Turei gave birth to in any way contributed to her upbringing?

It’s pertinent because if you’ve admitted to ripping off the taxpayer funded welfare system, as the Green co-leader has, then sources of income at a time she was claiming the benefit should be known.

The question though got short shrift from the MP who refused to speak about personal relationships, adding that she doesn’t believe women should be interrogated about those relationships.

It was a curious response, given that anyone claiming any benefit should declare their financial status before it’s paid to them.

Of course there is the rather inconvenient truth that it is the law for the child’s father to be named, so the taxpayer can recover some of the expenses the state is paying to provide for the little bairn.

In fact she took the argument further, telling journalists they were being unfair, asking the kind of interrogative questions that beneficiaries are subjected to all the time.

The same sort of interrogation isn’t applied to people getting working for families, she contends, nor is it applied to pensioners.

Well the latter’s universal, your are paid it regardless of your financial standing and the former is always paid depending on the financial status of the recipient and the number of kids in the household.

It’s a pity Turei wasn’t interrogated a little more closely when she was defrauding the system.

It is also unfair for people to rip off the taxpayer, we even have laws for that, it is called fraud and it is covered in the Crimes Act.

That interrogation will finally come next week when she meets a fraud investigator from the Social Development Ministry, more than 20 years too late.

When she admitted to fraud she must have known the blowtorch was about to be applied, given that she spent the best part of six years on the old domestic purposes benefit.

She’s now calling for an amnesty for those who are illegally dipping their hand into the taxpayer’s pocket which is a bit lame considering there was one in place when she was doing the same thing and she didn’t take advantage of it – so much for feeling guilty.

This campaign is carefully orchestrated though by The Greens to draw attention to poverty and the lengths some people will go to to put food on the table – and that’s laudable.

The debate is a valuable one and should have us all thinking about what it’s like living hand to mouth.

But on reflection Metiria Turei must be wondering what her admission could do to her career considering up to a thousand welfare fraudsters are prosecuted every year, and if she’s one of them, her time as an MP could well be over.

And good riddance to her too, if that is the case.

I think she believes she will get away with it. If she does then that will send an awful signal.

In the meantime I can’t wait for some left-wing to petition for the Pope to beatify Metiria Turei.

-NZ Herald


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

33%