Steve Joyce mocks Labour’s latest election bribe as the numbers, once again, don’t stack up

via ZDNet

The Labour Party wants to take $2.5 billion from Kiwi families from 1 April next year with a pale imitation of the Budget’s Family Incomes package, National Party Campaign Chair Steven Joyce says.

“They are proposing to tax more with one hand and give a bit back with the other hand but by their own admission Kiwi families would get fleeced $2.5 billion over the next four years in the process,” Mr Joyce says.

And for once, Labour aren’t going after the rich pricks.  

“And in their desperation to avoid shifting tax thresholds, they’ve dreamt up an even more confusing array of new and old subsidies while taxing low and middle income people at ever higher rates as their wages grow.

“It’s classic Labour Party smoke and mirrors. But at the end of it Kiwi families would be $2.5 billion worse off.

“Someone on the average wage would face an annual tax hike of $1100, while Labour would fork out a $3000 annual baby bonus for a family earning $150,000.

Labour’s desperate policies never last more than 48 hours of scrutiny.  Mostly because the policies didn’t take more than 48 hours to dream up in the first place.

Only Labour could announce a huge taxpayer give-away that is effectively a tax hike in disguise.


Do you want:

  • ad-free access?
  • access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • access to Incite Politics magazine articles?

Silver subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March.

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.