Queer theory is “truth”, science doesn’t matter and children know best

Ben Law

Australia’s Gay marriage debate is proving to be very different to the debate we had in New Zealand. In New Zealand, the debate was focused on the issue of equality only but In Australia, the Gay marriage debate is being used by activists to push the disturbing Safe Schools programme as well as an attack on the rights of parents who have children who think that they are transgender.

Ben Law – the young gay activist who recently tweeted that he might ‘hate f**k’ the homophobia out of MPs opposed to same-sex marriage – last week published Moral Panic 101, which includes advice for the mums and dads of Australia on how to be good parents. According to Law, we don’t just need Safe Schools to protect kids from bullies in the schoolyard, we need Safe Schools to protect kids from unenlightened parents. For some young people with old-fashioned parents “neither home nor school is safe.”

Michael, a teenager suffering from, PTSD, ADHD, as well as anxiety, depression and gender dysphoria, is Law’ case in point. Michael’s main problem is that his Christian “fundamentalist” parents still think “he” is a girl (because he is biologically female). While accepting that Michael may be a lesbian, they refuse to provide cross-sex hormones or allow their daughter to change her identity documents before the age of 18. Michael rolls “his” eyes at such unreasonable parental restriction. […]

I told my daughter in primary school that she could not get her ears pierced until she was 13 even though her friend’s mother was letting her daughter get them done. My daughter accepted both my authority and my reasoning behind the rule. I personally hadn’t got my ears pierced until I was 17 so my daughter knew that it was hardly the end of the world to have to wait.

Taking hormones that will change your body and your life forever is a world away from a decision to put holes in your earlobes and any good parent would insist that a child not make that decision till they are an adult just like with tattoos and any other decision to alter their body permanently.

But Law goes further, suggesting such parents may represent a danger to their children, stifling the very life out of them. He means to be sympathetic; he understands that parents are unsettled when change comes too fast and is too confronting. Some parents may feel “nostalgic” for a simpler time before queer theory arrived, “when boundaries were clearly defined, when boys were boys and girls were girls.” Despite any misgivings, parents today need to realise that those days are gone and get on board with the new social agenda by affirming sexual and gender diversity in their children.

On the basis of undisclosed experience, Law explains his approach to parenting

[…] Law’ advice is simple: your job as a parent is to put aside your protective impulses and follow your child’s lead.

Rather than trusting their instincts, parents should trust the experts. Gender expert, Dr Elizabeth […]  Riley’s approach is based on queer theory – that gender exists on a spectrum, it isn’t as simple as male and female. Riley is on record as saying, “I think, in truth, every human being is transgender … Until society can get that some boys are born with vaginas and some girls are born with penises, we’re always going to have this problem.”

Other experts need to be ignored. Paediatricians who point to scientific evidence that puberty-blockers and cross-sex hormones affect growing brains and bodies in harmful and irreversible ways are just confusing parents with “phantom hypotheticals”. Parents should not be “spooked” out of letting their child transition genders. Rather, we should all relax as Law guides us into the brave new world where queer theory is “truth”, science doesn’t matter and where children know best.

In fact, Law makes the case that children who are not allowed to transition genders are likely to kill themselves or suffer reduced life outcomes as a result. Since this is a “life-and-death issue”, we clearly can’t allow parents to get it wrong. “Here’s the uncomfortable reality: parents don’t always know best … Should parents’ wishes for their kids take priority when those wishes compromise that kid’s wellbeing?” Law quotes the view of an American social worker that “the greatest risk for these kids is their families.” Parents of Australia, unless you agree with the new world order, you may be considered “a risk of harm.”

For those who think this sounds alarmist, it needs to be pointed out that “risk of harm” is the exact phrase used in a directive from the NSW Education Department, which urges schools to consider whether their mandatory reporting obligations may require them to report parents of transgender children to Community Services.

[…]  In Canada, where the agenda for social change is more advanced, Bill 89 allows the State to remove children from “abusive” parents who refuse to celebrate a transgender identity for their offspring.

This is scary stuff. Already there are cases of foster children who were happily settled in loving foster homes being removed by the state because their foster families did not hold approved views. In one case they were removed (I am not joking) because the foster parents refused to say that the Easter Bunny is real.

[…] All parents should be rightly concerned about the idea that the State can impose one established orthodox understanding about sexuality and gender and remove children from “abusive” parents who depart from this.

John Howard said last week that parental rights were at stake in the same-sex marriage debate. Here’s proof that he is right.

-ACL.org

 

 


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

48%