Ardern acknowledges that McCully went rogue but refuses to condemn his actions

PM Jacinda Ardern as a student

Labour have never before turned down an opportunity to stick a pin in National. When they were in opposition they would even vote against a policy they supported simply because it was proposed by National. Ardern refusing to censure McCully for going behind his leaders back and acting without consultation is a puzzling circumstance since it was free political hit that I would have expected her to take. Is this another example of student politics or is there something else at play here?

Prime Minster, Jacinda Ardern, refused to comment on the Israel Institute of New Zealand poll conducted earlier this year. While most Kiwis supported Israel, Ardern has not taken a position either way, and this trend continued with the following answers to questions posed on TVNZ’s Q&A, 20 November.

Corin Dann: Was Murray McCully, when he was the foreign minister, out of line to co-sponsor the measure condemning Israeli settlements? He did that without cabinet approval.

Jacinda Ardern: Indeed, and putting aside the issue, the only question we’ve raised is whether there could’ve been a bit more of a process around it.

A bit more of a process? That reply is the equivalent of hitting McCully with a wet bus ticket.

Corin Dann: Do you support him in what he did? Because a lot of progressive left leaning New Zealanders would have actually been pretty proud of Murray McCully taking that stance. Do you personally support his stance?

Jacinda Ardern: We should absolutely use the voice that we had in a critical position within the UN at that time, a particularly critical position at that time, to yes, take a stand. The only issue we’ve raised is whether or not a process could’ve been gone through to involve at least the government on that.

So that’s a yes then?

It appears that Ms Ardern agrees with the biased text of the resolution, but hasn’t actually addressed it. It is pleasing, though, to note that she acknowledges the rogue nature of Murray McCully in co-sponsoring the resolution with Malaysia, Senegal, and Venezuela – without even consulting cabinet. Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters was one of the most vocal MPs against 2334 and yet Prime Minister Ardern seems to be unable to answer the question directly.

Corin Dann: Putting a cabinet minute into the coalition agreement sends a pretty strong signal, basically, that you’re saying he was out of line, so the message to the world is that he was on his own, it was a rogue decision, it wasn’t New Zealand’s decision

Jacinda Ardern: I disagree

Corin Dann: But how else can it be interpreted?

Jacinda Ardern: Simply, simply that. Whenever a government makes a decision, it makes one as a whole […]

That statement will come back to bite Ardern. If any of her ministers make a decision or announce a policy without cabinet approval then we can fairly say that it was a government decision and that the minister was not acting alone

[…] Given the level of outrage that was expressed at the time, and the number of Ministers who were either publicly or privately shocked at McCully’s actions, the decision to depart from a longstanding New Zealand policy of balance and co-sponsor and vote for the biased resolution […]

The resolution not only singularly blamed Israel for the conflict and failed to address Palestinian terror, it also undermined previous UN resolutions by declaring the holiest places in Judaism to be in “Occupied Palestinian Territory” and removed the need for the Palestinian leadership to negotiate for the land on which to build a state they claim to want.

-israelinstitute.nz

 


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

27%