Greenpeace is a well-oiled machine

With, apparently, no sense of irony, Rachel Stewart writes in her latest Herald opinion piece that Greenpeace is a well-oiled machine. (Sunflower oil?)

Everyone has an opinion on the media, and everyone has an opinion on climate change. This is an opinion on how it often appears that never the twain shall meet. Which, of course, is not true. It just feels like it is.

In a New Zealand context, we have so few science journalists – between 2011 and 2016 there have been only between one and three fulltime science print journalists at any given time. Each of them certainly gives climate change a fair crack of the whip, in both time and comprehensiveness.

But beyond the small pool of media science experts, I’m not seeing too much evidence that, bar a nuclear war, the greatest threat to humanity – global warming – is much more than a passing thought.

We have NZ media science experts?  Oh, you mean the ones who say, “the greatest threat to humanity; global warming …”

Indeed, the news and weather presenters on our two 6pm nightly news channels spend zero time worrying about extreme scorching weather. They just smirk inanely while bantering about how good it’ll be at the beach, and suggest chucking another sausage on the barbie. It’s disquieting and insulting.

The nightly news channels insult our intelligence over all manner of topics, why single out climate change?  From where I sit they are forever dropping “climate change” into irrelevant stories.

One has to admire their ability to carry on doing the tacit bidding of their overlords, and all with a straight face. It must be getter harder to do when, during the same news hour, they’ve led with an ever-increasing string of climate-related disasters.

It’s called ‘weather’, Rachel.

What got me thinking about all this was Greenpeace’s 45k-strong petition, and open letter signed by “leading New Zealanders”, delivered this week to Parliament and urging Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern to make good on her “climate change is my generation’s nuclear-free moment” declaration.

The call from Greenpeace is for the Government to end oil and gas exploration now. “The climate science is clear. If we are to avoid catastrophic impacts, the world cannot afford to burn even existing reserves of fossil fuels, let alone seek out and burn new reserves.” Now, who can argue with that? Intelligently, I mean.

Quite a number of people, actually. And if Christopher Monckton and his co-authors are proved correct then the climate science certainly is NOT clear and burning hydrocarbons is not a problem.

Signatories to the open letter include scientists, health professionals, iwi leaders, businesspeople, politicians, unions, poets, actors, and musicians. Oh, and journalists. Two of them. I’m one of them, but I’m just a lowly, contracted opinion writer who’s free to express a view. After all, it’s what I’m paid to do.[…]

Ditto, I’m just a lowly, contracted opinion writer who’s free to express a view. After all, it’s what I’m paid to do.

I signed because I believe that climate change is real, and fossil fuel extraction is the biggest driver of it, so why wouldn’t I? […] These are logical, practical, and easily-defendable positions for us to take.

Yet, when I tried to influence other media colleagues to do the same, I mostly smacked into a wall of silence. The ones that did respond were concerned about their employment – and said so. I get that, but I don’t have much truck with it.

Maybe they are finally beginning to see that the pile of failed climate doom predictions is getting ever larger while the list of successful climate doom predictions remains at zero?

Ingrained in every journalist’s training is a constant battle hymn. It sings about the notion of balanced, objective, neutral reporting. As it should.

Looking forward to your ‘balanced, objective, neutral reporting’ of the climate realists point of view, Rachel. Same time next week?

But if, as journalists, we accept that global warming and – its death grip made real – climate change are actually happening, then why would any of us hesitate to sign that Greenpeace letter?

Is it because we’re not quite ready to publicly differentiate between it being man-made or naturally occurring? This really shouldn’t be up for debate any longer amongst credible media outlets. Why? Because, science. The only ones pushing that barrow are the oil industry themselves, and the ten percenters looking to gain from business as usual. Anything else is denial. Plain and simple.

Still waiting for my oil cheque …

Or is it because Greenpeace comes across as too radical, too mouthy, too activist? I can remember a time when I thought that I despised them. Greenpeace seemed pious and sanctimonious somehow.

Now, I see a well-oiled machine. An effective organisation that’s doing more than any political party to bring environmental and humanitarian issues into everyday discourse. Basically, if the Greens had leadership like Greenpeace, they’d be fizzing. Who’s their CEO again? Oh, that’s right. Russel Norman.

So now we know why the Greens polling is so low: Russel left.

All I know is, as the weather gets steadily worse we need journalism to get steadily better. And maybe I’m being far too tough on those journos who could use their relative fame, power, and undeniable influence to change minds by signing an open letter to the Prime Minister, but choose not to.[…]

So which is it, Rachel?  Should our actions be based upon ‘Because, science’ or should they be based on the utterances of those with ‘relative fame, power, and undeniable influence’?

I think that I will stick with the tried and true ‘scientific method’ type science.


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to Podcasts?
  • Access to Political Polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

In solidarity with the those in the world’s most despised demographic, WH has decided to ‘come out’ as an old, white, male. WH enjoys exercising the white male privilege, that Whaleoil provides for him, to write the occasional post challenging climate change consensus; looking at random tech issues that tweak his interest, as a bit of a tech nerd; or generally poking the borax at anyone in public life who goes on record revealing their stupidity. WH never excelled on the sports field because his coaches never allowed him to play in his preferred position on the right-wing.  WH also enjoys his MG.

39%