Another minister with a shonky memory and a penchant for meddling

The government appear to have another meddling minister with a shonky memory.

Radio NZ reports:

Green Party Minister accused of ministerial interference is changing her story about meeting with the Environmental Protection Authority.

Eugenie Sage now says she didn’t meet with the EPA’s chief executive Allan Freeth when she previously said she did, and doesn’t think she discussed the EPA’s controversial chief scientist with him like she said she had.   

The scientist Jacqueline Rowarth resigned this year after Ms Sage, the associate Environment Minister, and others raised concerns about her conduct with Dr Freeth.

As well as forwarding a highly critical article about Dr Rowarth to the EPA, Ms Sage told Parliament 10 days ago she met with Dr Freeth and discussed her.

“I advised the EPA chief executive that my office had received correspondence expressing some concerns about media comments by the chief scientist – I was told the matter was in hand, there was no substantive discussion,” Ms Sage told the House.

Those comments led to accusations from National that Ms Sage had inappropriately interferred in staff matters at the EPA.

They have led to Dr Freeth returning to Parliament today, to explain why he told MPs he’d had “absolutely no discussions” with Ms Sage on the matter.

Now Ms Sage says she was wrong all along – and that her memory let her down.

“I was relying on my memory, and when we checked it was actually a meeting with the Ministry for the Environment – not with the EPA, so when I raised that (Dr Rowarth’s behaviour) it was with the chief executive of the MfE.”

Ms Sage said she met with the EPA’s Dr Freeth at a later date, when asked whether she discussed Dr Rowarth at the meeting she responded “my memory is that I didn’t”. End of quote.

What a complete muppet. She’s lost her memory, and perhaps she should lose her warrant? Her excuse still doesn’t help matters. It is clear she had it in for Dr Rowarth, and was gossiping about her to anyone who would listen.

My longest-standing friend in caucus has a good crack at the hapless minister:

National’s environment spokesperson Scott Simpson doesn’t buy the Minister’s new position.

“It’s very confusing for her [Sage], because for her not to be able to distinguish between the chief executive of the EPA, a middle aged male, versus the chief executive of the Ministry for the Environment, a female, is beyond belief.”

Ms Sage said she had learnt a valuable lesson.

“The learning I have got on this is not to rely on my memory but to actually check the records.”

Mr Simpson said Ms Sage’s credibility had taken “more than a bit of a knock”.

“Here is a minister who is deeply wounded by not being on top of the detail, clearly out of her depth and at best confused and at worst deceitful”. End of quote.

Dr Freeth will appear before the environment select committee this morning.

Two good sledges in just one article from Scott Simpson.

This government are the most inept I have seen since Koro Wetere graced the government benches. They better learn the ropes real fast or they will be on the ropes as a government in short order.

It is now becoming utterly embarrassing for the prime minister but, to be fair, her mind is probably on other matters.

Still, this government claims a mandate. Best they get on with governing instead of opening their mouths to remove one foot only to insert another.


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

40%