Hooton on Labour’s fiscal boat anchor

Matthew Hooton writes about Labour’s fiscal boat anchor:

Plans for big petrol-tax hikes but $5 billion of cuts to state-highway upgrades are the latest sign Grant Robertson’s numbers don’t add up.

Steven Joyce was first to warn of trouble ahead but suggesting some type of $11.7b accounting error obscured his genuine point that Robertson had simply decided against making provision for spending increases outside a narrow range of promises.

In less than six months, the government has burned through most of its provisions for new operating and capital spending. On a five-year basis, there has been $5b for Shane Jones’ provincial growth fund, $5.5b for welfare, $2.6b for first-year students, $2b for KiwiBuild, $3.3b for the New Zealand Superannuation Fund, plus a few hundred million for other bibs and bobs. Reversing National’s tax cuts will save only $8.4b over five years.

The government now finds itself struggling to meet the demands of nurses, teachers and other key Labour constituencies for pay rises, let alone make the significant new investments in health, law and order, and transport and other infrastructure that the median voters who switched from National to Labour expect.

Labour’s ideological aversion to private-public partnerships in health, education and corrections makes things even tougher. There clearly needs to be a brand-new hospital in South Auckland after the scandal at Middlemore yet the government has ruled out sharing such costs and risks with the private sector.

Robertson’s latest attempt to bridge the fiscal gap has created yet another political debacle where provincial New Zealand is being told to pay higher taxes in exchange for inferior roads.

The deal is not much better for Aucklanders, who face a 22c per litre petrol tax hike in exchange for projects like the tram down Dominion Road.

The government’s fiscal problem is rapidly turning into a political one. End of quote.

Twyford’s tram tax has gone down like a cup of cold sick. Hooton continues:

The heart of the problem is Robertson’s so-called “anchor” of fiscal discipline: his promise to reduce government debt to 20 per cent of GDP by 2022. This was designed as a political ploy to compete with Joyce’s commitment to reach 20 per cent by 2020 and then push on with debt repayment to reach just 10-15 per cent by 2025.

Robertson has convinced himself that sticking to his commitment is essential to maintain the confidence of the business community and financial markets.

He remembers the Winter of Discontent of 2000 and is determined to avoid at all costs investors and business becoming actively hostile to the new regime.

But this just shows Robertson’s naivety about the business and finance communities and woeful ignorance of what drives confidence in either.

At a net 22 per cent of GDP, New Zealand’s debt is already low compared with the rest of the world. If carefully signalled and communicated by Robertson and his Treasury officials, it is implausible that a further extension of the 20 per cent debt target to, say, 2025, would provoke a materially adverse reaction from the business community or financial markets, especially if emphasis was placed on investments in infrastructure and human capital.

Moreover, the business and financial communities well understand and accept that the fundamental difference between Labour and National governments — at least theoretically — is that the former believes in bigger government than the latter. End of quote.

The business community is just hunkering down and hoping the coalition implodes. It’s a valid strategy and, based on the past few weeks, looks likely. This government will be a one-term government unless something drastic occurs. It is at times like this that we can be thankful we have a three-year term and not a four or five-year term. The old saying goes that three years is too long for a Labour government and not long enough for a National one. Hooton surmises that Labour’s winter of discontent could be worse:

Already beset by political mismanagement, weak prime ministerial leadership and ethical scandals, the government may fear the process of gently walking back Robertson’s overly staunch fiscal parameters.

But what is the alternative?

A winter of discontent involving teachers, nurses and motorists would surely be more damaging to the government than the business community’s revolt 18 years ago.

One option is to hope fiscal outcomes continue to outperform forecasts, like this week’s government financial statements for the eight months to the end of February which delivered a surplus $494 million higher than expected just a month ago. But that is a big bet to place when Jacinda Ardern’s re-election is at stake.

The better course is for Robertson and Ardern to more confidently own Labour’s commitment to higher spending and begin the process of gently stretching out the debt reduction target.

If they manage that process well, there will be not the slightest blip in either the dollar, the NZX or investor or business confidence, but a necessary protection of Labour’s ratings in the polls.  End of quote.

I don’t think Labour can manage anything well at all. Their prime minister is all at sea and no one is really in charge, which is why ministers are winging it and failing.


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to Podcasts?
  • Access to Political Polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.

39%