He doesn’t like MBIE advice, nor treasury’s, now it seems he doesn’t like NZTA advice either

Phil Twyford, the vainglorious minister of housing and also transport, doesn’t really like anyone’s advice except his own.

He criticised MBIE advice on housing, then treasury’s advice as well, and now he is ignoring NZTA advice and pressing ahead with a dreadfully expensive transport solution out of pure ideology.

The NZ Herald reports: Quote:

Transport Minister Phil Twyford has received official advice to do more work on using buses instead of modern trams from downtown Auckland to the airporta move that could save taxpayers as much as $2.5 billion.

But the minister, who says trams to the airport has a preliminary estimate of $3.7b, has rejected the idea of running buses on a dedicated corridor. Officials have put a cost of $1.2b to use advanced buses to the airport.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Twyford made an election promise last August to build modern trams, or light rail, from the CBD to the airport and from the CBD to West Auckland. The latest cost estimate for the project is $6b.

Papers obtained by the Herald under the Official Information Act show Twyford was advised by the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) shortly after coming to office in November to look further at advanced buses to the airport before finalising the preferred mode.

Officials said new transport technology was evolving quickly and narrowing the difference between the levels of service and capacity between advanced buses and modern trams, citing an example being tested in China.

These technologies (of the buses) have the potential to deliver light rail performance at lower cost due to less track and fewer overhead infrastructure requirements.

“Before finalising the preferred mode, the proven ability of these systems to deliver similar levels of service at significantly lower cost should be confirmed,” NZTA said in a briefing note to Twyford dated November 1.

Last night, Twyford said NZTA and Auckland Transport made a decision under the former National Government that light rail was the most appropriate form of mass transit from the city to the airport.

Since receiving the briefing note on November 1, Twyford said, officials from AT had visited China to look at the bus technology using autonomous vehicles with rubber wheels running on rails.

The officials found for a number of reasons the technology was not suitable for Auckland. It was unproven and not in commercial use outside China, was slower than light rail and battery powered requiring longer stops at the end of the lines, he said.

This month, Twyford and Finance Minister Grant Robertson launched a procurement process for a modern light rail network to “transform Auckland”, saying the Government had received an unsolicited approach from the Super fund to design, build and operate it.

Work done by NZTA and AT last year on an advanced bus study for Auckland was picked up by then Transport Minister Simon Bridges to protect a mass transport route to the airport for buses before changing to light rail after 30 years.

The study found advanced buses could provide a credible solution over the next 30 years. End quote.

Oh no, Phil Twyford knows best. But, it’s hilarious that, after bagging everything the previous government did, he now thinks they got something right… even though the officials say they haven’t.

Maybe his cunning plan is to get rid of all the officials and departments because he doesn’t need them. He knows best.


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.

Listen to this post:
Voiced by Amazon Polly
39%