Anti-Muslim hate crime as defined by the London police

source: Paul Joseph Watson Twitter

When I read the above list of anti-Muslim hate crimes as defined by the London Police I felt like I had entered the Twilight Zone. To the average reader, the list appears to be a checklist of undeniable facts. Londoners are living in an Orwellian city if this report is anything to go by. It is a crime to have a negative opinion about Islam but even worse it is a crime to state provable facts and to tell the truth about the religion.

The eight components of Islamophobia according to this British police report are:

1. Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.

This statement is one that is clearly an opinion and one that every person with free speech should be entitled to hold. There are countless fact-based arguments in support of this opinion just as there is no doubt some fact-based arguments against it. It all comes down to how you define Islam. It should not be a crime to hold the above opinion about Islam.

 

 

2. Islam is seen as separate and ‘other’ It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.

This statement is quite strange as the last part is that Islam does not influence other cultures when in fact it is that influence that opponents of Islam are most concerned about. The other major concern is that many people from an Islamic culture do not assimilate because their culture is resistant to the values of our Western culture.

This statement apart from the last part about influence appears wholly factual. While there may be a few small values that Western culture has in common with Islamic culture most Islamic values as illustrated by Islamic religious law (Sharia) are completely at odds with our own.

Should it be a crime for me to say that paedophilia is acceptable in Islamic culture when my statement is a provable fact? If a culture supports and encourages child brides then, of course, it has values at odds with our own.

3. Islam is seen as inferior to the west. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.

Reading this statement I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

screenshot: Whaleoil

Hands up if you think Sharia law is NOT an accelerated learning program.

4. Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a ‘clash of civilisations.’

Again this is an opinion that anyone with free speech should be perfectly entitled to hold. Are the British police really going to lock up the British families who have lost family members to Islamic terrorist acts in the UK for holding that opinion?

5. Islam is seen as a political ideology and is used for political or military advantage.

This statement is a total joke. London, the capital city of what used to be a great Western nation now has a Muslim mayor and other British towns have Muslims in charge or in positions of political power. Already that power is being used to advance Islamic cultural values and Sharia law which is changing forever British society. If believing that Islam is a political ideology is a hate crime then stating that the sky is blue should also be a hate crime.

6. Criticisms of the West made by Islam are rejected out of hand.

So now it is a crime to reject a foreign culture’s ideas of how my culture should be changed? If I don’t want to wear a hijab and want to wear a bikini and reject the notion that I am not modest and will be responsible for my own rape because of how I am dressed, I am now committing a crime? The fact that this Orwellian report has been written by the London police proves that political Islam does exist and that it has successfully infiltrated the British police.

7. Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.

Many Muslims exclude themselves from mainstream society by refusing to assimilate and by living apart in Muslim only communities. We do not exclude them they exclude themselves by refusing to integrate. With regards to so-called discriminatory practices this not because non-Muslims want to exclude Muslims it is because Muslims make themselves unemployable by refusing to assimilate and fit in with the society and culture that they are living in.

In New Zealand, for example, a jewellery store had its good name dragged through the mud in the media simply because it told a young Muslim woman that if they hired her they would require her to not wear any headgear just like every other employee.

8. Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural and normal.

I would love to know what their definition of hostility is. I suspect that my opposition to Islam as a political ideology would be defined by the London police as anti-Muslim hostility despite the fact that I would never ever be hostile towards a Muslim New Zealander in person.

It seems to me that the police are legislating against bigotry which is a person’s opinion. Islam is full of bigotry towards non-Muslims yet something tells me that the London police will not be at all concerned about that.

 

 


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

If you agree with me that’s nice, but what I really want to achieve is to make you question the status quo, look between the lines and do your own research. Do not be a passive observer in this game we call life.

You can follow me on Gab.ai 

To read my previous articles click on my name in blue.

Listen to this post:
Voiced by Amazon Polly
64%