Matthew Hooton thinks we have now arrived at ‘communism by stealth’

Matthew Hooton writes about the damage that Working for Families is doing to our economy: Quote:

The Government, district health boards and any nurses organisation officials primarily concerned with Labour’s re-election know they have to stand firm against the rebellious nurses in the wards.

Each of these powerful groups know ordinary nurses getting the pay rises they seek, and probably deserve, will cause an industrial contagion, first through the public sector, including teachers, firefighters, police officers, junior doctors and salaried medical specialists, and then through the entire labour market.

Strike action will reach levels not seen since the 1980s. Grant Robertson’s fiscal strategy will be in ruins and Jacinda Ardern will have to forget her dreams of a second term. End quote.

I’d say that the government are fast running out of time to fix the stuff-ups their inept ministers are causing. It is still too early to call it, but I do suspect we maybe looking at the first one-term government in 45 years. Quote:

A major but overlooked cause of the low-wage economy driving today’s worsening industrial strife is Helen Clark’s flagship 2004 Working for Families policy.

In one of his few memorable phrases, National’s then deputy finance spokesman, John Key, declared Working for Families “communism by stealth“.

Key argued cogently that the abatement regime for Working for Families would level net incomes so radically that a two-child family would end up with pretty much the same in the hand whether their gross income was $38,000 or $60,000 a year.

Infamously, Key then entrenched Working for Families as Prime Minister, and Ardern and Robertson have further locked in middle-class dependency with their December 2017 Families Package. End quote.

God knows why he did that. But then, John Key never really cared for proper solutions; he just wanted his knighthood, a fourth term and to beat Keith Holyoake’s tenure. In the end all he could settle for was his knighthood. Quote:

In fact in 2004, the left-wing critique of Working for Families was stronger than Key’s, that it would operate as a subsidy of low-paying employers.

That is, using Key’s original numbers, if there was a job to do worth $60,000 a year, an employer could hire someone with two kids, pay them just $38,000 a year, and they’d end up with almost the same pay in the hand.

Union bosses rightly feared it would be difficult to get workers with children to sign up for a pay campaign if it made little difference whether they earned $38,000 or $60,0000 a year.

Worse, if Government subsidises something, there will be more of it, in this case low-paid jobs. To an employer, Working for Families screams out: “Don’t buy more plant and machinery or invest in on-job training, just hire a few more low-skilled labour units and get the government to pick up a big hunk of the tab.” End quote.

This is why I oppose subsidies. They send the wrong signals to the market. It is why Tesla continues to exist. If and when Donald Trump works out how much government money is propping up that ponzi scheme of Elon Musk’s the party will be over. Quote:

There is very little doubt Working for Families had led to lower productivity and wages across the economy than had Clark not launched it as her big 2004 Budget bribe to fend off Don Brash’s Orewa-speech challenge.

That is bad for everyone but the most pernicious effects of Clark’s bribe are on those without children trying to save for a first home, such as young nurses, teachers, doctors, and police officers.

They suffer from the economy-wide lower wages caused by Working for Families but without the top ups.

Thanks to Clark, Key and Ardern, the best way for a childless nurse, teacher, doctor or police officer to get an after-tax pay rise is not to work harder, get promoted or even join the union and go on strike, but to get themselves or their partner pregnant.

When trying to buy a house, childless people also have to compete with those with children, whose after-tax incomes have been artificially inflated by the state.

Working for Families then creates a vicious economic and political cycle. As it holds back productivity and keeps wages low, the best electoral response is to expand it further, as Ardern and Robertson did in December.

And what better way to stop nurses, teachers, doctors, and police officers from striking than to ensure the ones with children will get nothing out of doing so?

Working for Families already costs taxpayers $3.2 billion a year. Expect that to rise before the next election as a tactic to split unions between those with or without children, buy some industrial peace and secure Ardern’s re-election.

And don’t expect National to be able to do anything about it. With the financial status of so many working families now as locked in to welfare as any other beneficiary, abolishing Working for Families is becoming ever-more politically impossible.

It has transferred the primary economic relationship that determines family income from being that with the employer to that with the state. It is indeed communism by stealth. Clark and Cullen knew exactly what they doing when they set it up. End quote.

And dopey old John Key extended it.

Where Working for Families comes undone is when the children start growing up and dropping off. The family, by this stage, are well used to their subsidies, and then all of a sudden they stop. The increased mortgage payments and borrowing that WFF enabled them to engage in will now choke the shit out of them. This is now starting to happen.


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.

Listen to this post:
Voiced by Amazon Polly
64%