Don Brash expands on why he doesn’t rate John Key

Don Brash has expanded on his comment the other day about why it is he thinks John Key shouldn’t rate: Quote:

On a recent TV programme, I was provoked into quoting a recent assessment of the Key/English Government by Kerry McDonald, a former director of the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research, and chief executive or chairman of a number of major companies. He had rated that Government at zero out of 10. On the TV programme, I said I agree with that assessment.

“Too harsh” was the response of Duncan Garner after I had left the studio. John Key steered us successfully through the Global Financial Recession and the Christchurch earthquakes.

Broadly true, though our ability to weather the GFC was due in no small part to the strength of the Australian-owned banking system and the economic buoyancy of our two biggest export markets, China and Australia. And despite that our recession was still pretty severe, with unemployment taking eight or nine years to get back towards pre-GFC levels.

But compared with what John Key promised going into the 2008 election, an objective observer would have to say that he dodged, or failed, all the really big issues. End quote.

Yep, he only spent political capital on promoting a flag, and failed at that. His other failures are now being dissected. Quote:

He promised to close the large gap in incomes between New Zealand and Australia, and established the 2025 Taskforce to provide advice on how best to do that. He appointed me to chair that taskforce, and appointed four others to it. And then totally ignored our recommendations. The gap between New Zealand incomes and those in Australia is as big now as it was in 2008.

Yes, aggregate economic growth has been strong because of a very high level of immigration, but income per capita has barely increased because productivity growth has been lamentably slow.

He promised to make housing more affordable, and noted that in 2008 the median house price in Auckland was six times the median household income. Today it is nine times, something which, along with stagnant real incomes, explains much of the current social distress.

With the help of a buoyant export market and Bill English’s careful stewardship, he presided over a fiscal process which did, commendably, get the budget back into balance, but resolutely refused to make the adjustments needed to deal with the deteriorating long-term fiscal outlook, the result of our steadily ageing population.

He promised never to raise the age of eligibility for New Zealand Superannuation — despite that being under way in similar pension schemes in Australia, the UK, the US and many other developed countries. English had the courage to announce that the age of eligibility would need to rise, but then said a gradual process would not even begin until 2037!

Key spoke about the need to increase the export orientation of the economy, and set a target for exports of goods and services of 40 per cent of GDP, up from 30 per cent when he came to office. Today, exports are just 27 per cent of GDP, despite continued buoyancy in world markets.

In the 2008 election campaign, Key continued a commitment first made by Bill English in 2003 to scrap Māori electorates, and appeared committed to treating all New Zealanders as equal before the law, something which had long been National Party policy.

Ten years on, the Māori electorates are still with us (more than 30 years after the Royal Commission on the Electoral System suggested they should be scrapped if MMP was adopted); the RMA has had a whole raft of additional racially-based commitments added to it; and we’re still wondering what on earth the implications of the Marine and Coastal Area Act will be.

The Key Government did see the creation of the Productivity Commission and a small number of charter schools — both Act Party initiatives — but there was no attempt to unwind some of the Clark Government’s policies which Key had denounced so strongly when in Opposition.

Key was exceptionally gifted as a self-deprecating after-dinner speaker. He had enormous political capital. Alas, he almost totally failed to use it to deal with the deep-seated problems we faced in 2008 and still face today. End quote.

A harsh but accurate litany of failure. John key enjoyed unprecedented popularity, the National party rode high in the polls, and yet they delivered pretty much nothing other than it was the blue team and not the red team on the Treasury benches.

It was such a dreadful waste of popularity. That is the sad an undeniable legacy of John Key.


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.

Listen to this post:
Voiced by Amazon Polly
31%