Yellow-dog Democrats want their Jim Crow back

Caption: Well, at least they’re not using bull-whips and dogs any more

150 years ago, Democrat voters fought the bloodiest war in America’s history in order to keep black people as slaves. When they lost the war, they resorted to segregation laws in order to keep “the negroes” under control. They lost the Civil Rights battle, too.

Fast forward to 2018. Even Democrats have conceded that they’ll never be allowed to keep black people as literal property any more but they seem hell-bent on resurrecting Jim Crow. There are already demands for segregated housing on college campuses. Now, violent Democrat mobs are trying to drive ‘uppity’ black women away from their lily-white lunch counters. Quote:

Conservative commentator Candace Owens, previously mentioned once or twice at this site, finds herself surrounded by a white-dominated crowd of shrieking leftist hatebabies in Philadelphia.

So now we’ve got white people openly screaming abuse at a black woman. End of quote.

America hasn’t witnessed scenes like this since they desegregated Southern schools in the late 50s. Candace should probably be grateful that they only had a bullhorn, and not the bull-whips they once used to drive ‘coloureds’ away from white eating establishments.

But other “people of colour” were less fortunate. As Owens reported: Quote:

To be clear: ANTIFA, an all-white fascist organization, just grew violent and attacked an all-black and Hispanic police force.

Because I, a BLACK woman, was eating breakfast.

Is this the civil rights era all over again? End of quote.

One difference, I guess, is that these days racist Democrats burn cars, not crosses. But it’s the same spittle-flecked, screaming hate for black people who refuse to ‘know their place’ and keep to the back of the political bus.

Jack Prosobiec is more than a little bit of a nutter. It should shame Democrats that even he can clearly see the ugly parallels between their past and present behaviour. Quote:

I haven’t seen this many white Democrats kick a black woman out of a diner since the 1950s. End of quote.

Watch the hateful toddlers throw their massive tanty, here:

 


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

Who is Lushington D. Brady?

Well, a pseudonym. Obviously.

But the name Lushington Dalrymple Brady has been chosen carefully. Not only for the sum of its overall mien of seedy gentility, reminiscent perhaps of a slightly disreputable gentlemen of letters, but also for its parts, each of which borrows from the name of a Vandemonian of more-or-less fame (or notoriety) who represents some admirable quality which will hopefully animate the persona of Lushington D. Brady.

Listen to this post:
40%