Map of the day

Source – brilliantmaps.com

Click on image for a high-res view

So what if the ‘Did Not Votes’ Count?

Gotta love a what if?

The map above shows what the 2016 US Presidential Election results would have been if votes are not cast for Hillary, Trump or one of the third party candidates had gone to a fictional candidate ?Did Not Vote.?

Disclaimer:?The map above was accurate as of January 17th, 2017. Totals below were true at the time of writing but may no longer currently be accurate as additional votes and recounts are conducted.

Only 8 states + Washington DC, had high enough voter turnouts where one of the actual candidates won more votes than people who did not bother to vote. Iowa and Wisconsin for Trump and Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire and DC for Clinton.

A few other 2016 election facts for you:

  • As a?percentage of eligible voters, Clinton received?28.43%?(65,845,063) of all votes compared to Trump?s?27.20%?(62,980,160) and Did Not Vote?s?44.37%(102,731,399).

  • Total voter turnout was estimated to be?55.3%?of the voting age population and?59.0%?of the voting eligible population.

  • It is the?5th election?since 1820 when the winner of the popular vote lost the presidency (the others being?1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000)

  • Donald Trump received?2,046,656 more?votes than Romney did in 2012, but Hilary Clinton received?70,732 fewer?votes than Obama did in 2012.

  • Neither Candidate even won a majority of votes cast, Clinton got?48.0%?vs Trump?s?45.9%.

  • As a percentage of the entire US population (including those too young or other ineligible to vote) Clinton got votes from?20.30%?of the population and Trump got votes from?19.41%?of people.

  • Washington DC is the only area in the country where a majority of all eligible voters (whether they voted or not) voted for Clinton (90% of voters, voted for Clinton on a?55.7%?turnout). In the other 6 states listed above, victories were simple pluralities.

Brilliantmaps.com

59%
×