‘I survived Communism: Are you ready for your turn?’

Statues remembering the victims of the Communist era in the Czech capital Prague

The article below was written by?Zuzana Janosova Den Boer, who experienced Communist rule in Czechoslovakia before coming to Canada.

?Having recognized all-too familiar signs […] in my adopted country of Canada, I felt obligated to write the article below […] I do not want my adopted country to suffer the same fate as the country from which I emigrated […]?

Her warning is something all New Zealanders need to see particularly those of you who have previously voted for the Green party. That?s why I?m sharing her article in full on Whaleoil and I encourage you all to share it

An important warning for New Zealand

?It was scientifically proven that communism is the only social-economic system providing the masses with justice and equality ? 100% of scientists agree on this. The topic is not up for debate!?, so proclaimed my professor during one of his lectures on the subject ?scientific communism?, while the country of Czechoslovakia was still under communist control. I was reminded of his blustery pronouncement the first time I encountered the spurious claim that ?a consensus of 97% of scientists agree global warming is man-made.? Most people don?t question scientific statements because they think they are facts. They do not understand that scientific statements must always be challenged, because Science is not about ?consensus?ideology is.

In March of 2007, the website WorldNetDaily published an article entitled ?Environmentalism is new communism?. In it, the former Czech president, Vaclav Klaus, stated: ?It becomes evident that, while discussing climate, we are not witnessing a clash of views about the environment, but a clash of views about human freedom.? He goes on to describe environmentalism as ?the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity.? Klaus has also written a book: ?Blue planet in green shackles?, in which he states

?communism and environmentalism have the same roots; they both suppress freedom.?

Vaclav Klaus

He also warns that any brand of environmentalism calling for centralized planning of the economy under the slogan of ?protecting nature? is nothing less than a reincarnation of communism ? new communism.Klaus understands communist propaganda very well ? he should. Most of us who lived and suffered under communism can instantly recognize any signs of communist ideology, no matter how slight or subtle. Since I received my own vaccination of communist propaganda, during the first 27 years of my life, I too am immune to this disease. If someone is trying to ?save me? against my will, I?m instantly wary and ready to fight back ? if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it?s a duck. So try to imagine how I feel, now as a Canadian, when I see the same tactics and hear the same phrases I saw and heard for years under communism, only this time in English!  If you think I?m paranoid, or that communism in North America is far-fetched, then good luck to you ? I hope you enjoy what?s coming your way:

?You [North] Americans are so gullible. No, you won?t accept Communism outright; but we?ll keep feeding you small doses of Socialism until you will finally wake up and find that you already have Communism. We won?t have to fight you; we?ll so weaken your economy, until you fall like overripe fruit into our hands.?

Nikita Khrushchev (1960)

Communism can be characterized by a single word: deception. Communists never disclose their real intentions. They are fraudsters who employ different identities, names and slogans, all for one goal: totalitarian enslavement. Since 1970, the goal of the Communist Party USA has been to subvert environmentalism and use it to advance their agenda. In 1972, Gus Hall, then chairman of the Communist Party USA, stipulated in his book ?Ecology?:

?Human society cannot basically stop the destruction of the environment under capitalism. Socialism is the only structure that makes it possible ?This is true in the struggle to save the environment ? We must be the organizers, the leaders of these movements. What is new, is that knowledge of [a] point-of-no-return gives this struggle an unusual urgency.?

This idea was incorporated into the US Green Party program in 1989 (the same year soviet communism collapsed), in which the fictitious threats of ?global warming? and ?climate change? are used to scare the public into believing humanity must ?save the planet?:

?This urgency, along with other Green issues and themes it interrelates, makes confronting the greenhouse [effect] a powerful organizing tool ? Survival is highly motivating, and may help us to build a mass movement that will lead to large-scale political and societal change in a very short time ?

First of all, we [must] inform the public that the crisis is more immediate and severe than [they] are being told, [that] its implications are too great to wait for the universal scientific confirmation that only eco-catastrophe would establish.?

Do you think the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is promoting science rather than socialism?  Read the following admission from the co-chair of the UN IPCC Working Group III, during an interview in 2010 with the Swiss newspaper Neue Z?rcher Zeitung:

?We must free ourselves from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy ? We must state clearly that we use climate policy de facto to redistribute the world?s wealth.?

To be continued…