Anjem Choudary

Western Prisons desperately need deradicalisation programmes

Islamic radicals do not fear Western prisons because not only are they free to radicalise others while inside the prisons they also get special treatment including Halal food. Our prisons instead of acting as a deterrent are a key part of Western Jihadists’ radicalisation plan and are aiding and abetting the rapid growth of radical Muslim followers.

September 6. Anjem Choudary, one of the most outspoken Islamists in Britain, was sentenced?to five years and six months in prison for activities supporting Islamic State. Choudary, 49, was sentenced at the Old Bailey in London after his conviction in August of urging Muslims to support IS in sermons posted on YouTube. He was convicted alongside his associate, Mohammed Rahman, 33, who was also sentenced to five years and six months in prison.

Choudary has said he is not afraid of going to prison, which he describes as a fertile ground for gaining more converts to Islam. “If they arrest me and put me in prison, I will carry on in prison,” he warned. “I will radicalize everyone in prison.”

Read more »

Dodgy Wog Anjem Choudary is also a hypocrite

37F5B49A00000578-0-image-m-12_1473150600333

Where there is a religious public figure there is always a hypocrite.

Hate preacher Anjem Choudary spent years chiding the West, calling for Sharia law in Britain and even claiming he wanted to move to ISIS-occupied Syria.

But, as a photo which emerged today shows, the notorious cleric was happy to enjoy the lifestyle provided by living in the UK.

The picture, taken while Choudary was on bail ahead of his terror trial, shows him purchasing a McDonald’s meal. ? Read more »

Good judge tells bad wogs to stop bludging as he sentences hate-preacher Anjem Choudary to prison

Good job, hate-preacher Anjem Choudary is off to the pokie for more than 5 years, by which time all his pals in ISIS will probably be dead.

A senior judge has challenged Islamist extremists who live on benefits while claiming to “despise” Western democracy, as he sentenced hate preacher Anjem Choudary to five-and-half years in prison.

Choudary has lived on benefits in the UK for the past 20 years, during which time it is understood he has claimed up to ?500,000 from the state.

While living off the state – dubbing his benefits ‘Jihadiseekers’ Allowance’ – Choudary became one of the country’s most notorious radical preachers – professing hatred against the West.

But he managed to avoid a criminal conviction until he was charged last year with drumming up support for a terrorist organisation by pledging allegiance to Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (Isil).

On Tuesday he was sentenced alongside fellow radical Islamist Mohammed Mizanur Rahman after both being convicted of inviting support for the terrorist group.

Before sentencing them, Mr Justice Holroyde heard that the pair were both living off benefits.

After hearing Mr Rahman’s lawyer speak, the judge asked: ?Is it not an anathema to be funded by the liberal Western democracy he so adamantly despises??

MPs have now called for the Home Secretary to be given powers to block hate preachers from receiving benefits.

What a good idea.

A former work and pensions secretary also spoke of his frustration at being unable to deprive terrorist suspects of state benefits.

The Old Bailey heard a ?calculating? and ?dangerous? Choudary had published an oath of allegiance to Isil knowing it was likely to encourage his vulnerable or fanatical followers to commit terrorist attacks.

Mr Justice Holroyde dismissed regret from the 49?year-old, saying he “knew exactly what he was doing”.

The judge said Choudary had invited support for Isil?while it was ?engaged in appalling acts of terrorism?.

He said: “At no point did either of you say anything to condemn the violent means by which [Isil] claimed to have established a caliphate.?

The Old Bailey heard Choudary was an influential ideologue who had tens of thousands of followers on social media. He publicised his oath at a crucial time just as Isil had launched its self-styled caliphate in Iraq and Syria and many people were looking for guidance on its legitimacy.

Choudary?s influence was so strong that Siddhartha Dhar, who is later believed to have succeeded ?Jihadi John? as Isil executioner, asked him for a ?verdict? on the caliphate, saying his words ?would be gold on Twitter”.

Sentencing both Choudary and Rahman, 33, each to five-and-a-half years, Mr Justice Holroyde said they had shown ?no remorse at all for anything you have said or done, and I have no doubt you will continue to communicate your message whenever you can?.

Their supporters in the public gallery shouted ?Allahu Akbar? as the two men were led from the dock.

Of course they did. Export them back whence they came.

It’s a small win, but essentially pissing into the wind.

 

– The Telegraph

 

Tagged:

How many naughty things can you put in three sentences?

Islam to be fair takes all the joy out of life. Below is a list of all the things we are not allowed under the religion of peace.

Just for fun see how many of the forbidden things you can put into three sentences about a guy we will call Muhammad.

CKEefjiWoAE6iUP

ISIS supporter has released a guide on establishing ‘Muslim gangs’

An ISIS supporter has released a guide on establishing ‘Muslim gangs’, and how to spread hate among Islamic communities, in order to stop them integrating with non-Muslims, and using charities as fronts to raise cash for the cause.

Jihadi supporters have been circulating a radical guidebook on social media, providing deadly instructions on how to create a active terror cell.

The shocking handbook, which has not been named by the MailOnline, worryingly contains a chapter by chapter guide to financing ‘Muslim gangs’ and obtaining weapons in the UK.

The book appears to be targeting a British audience, with harrowing references to a number of Britain’s worst terror cases.

Behind the cover of a charitable organisation raising awareness of Islamic teachings, gang members are urged to draw in recruits covertly off the streets.

Terrifyingly detailed bomb making instructions are laid out in another chapter, complete with basic diagrams for making a bomb out of a fizzy drink can.? Read more »

Mad mullah says Pamela Geller should be executed

https://youtu.be/m3xuj-aJyaE

Andrew Bolt blogs:

Prominent British Islamist preacher Anjem Choudary says it on live TV and to the face of the woman he wants killed:

We?re talking about people who deliberately had a competition to insult the messenger Mohammad? If you saw the cartoons that Charlie Hebdo drew you would understand the anger. And now this woman was to draw cartoons or have people draw cartoons to insult the prophet knowing full well that this carries the death penalty in Islam? She should be put before Shariah court and tried and of course she would face capital punishment. ? Read more »

Norway makes one step forward and two steps back

Today I read about how the government of Norway( despite public opposition to their decision) deported 824 Muslims. According to many different reports on the internet this resulted in a 30-31% decrease in violent crime. Reading this made me think that if such an unpopular decision had such measurable and pleasing results that it would enable the Government to make more sensible non politically correct decisions to protect its country.

Unfortunately they are not consistent in their decisions as a man I would consider public enemy number one in Norway was not deported back to Iraq because he risks the death penalty there.

Mullah Krekar (original name: Najmeddine Faraj Ahmad) is a Kurd who moved from Iraq to Norway in 1991

Mullah Krekar (original name: Najmeddine Faraj Ahmad) is a Kurd who moved from Iraq to Norway in 1991

This is a man who has spoken at length about how he and Islam supports murdering anyone who burns a Koran or draws a cartoon of Muhammad. This is a man who in 2012 was sentenced to 5 years in prison for making repeated death threats against Norwegian politicians and kurds if they pursued certain civil actions against him. This is a man who ..

Read more »

1. 5 Billion Muslims have their feelings hurt

-twitter

-twitter

A record 3 million copies of the new edition of satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo have appeared on French newsstands, with new caricatures triggering outrage among Muslims all over the world, and threats from radical Islamists.

British radical preacher Anjem Choudary, who is allegedly connected with armed militant groups, decried the new edition as an “act of war” and a “blatant provocation.”

Many mainstream Muslim organizations also reacted by saying that the mere depiction of the prophet is a sacrilege: Egypt’s Islamic body Dar al-Ifta branded the publication “an unjustified provocation against the feelings of 1.5 billion Muslims,”

-AFP

Unjustified provocation? Unjustified? They get slaughtered in the name of Islam and retaliate with what? Violence? No. Murder? No. They mock those who massacred them and bravely show that they will not be silenced and that freedom of speech is a cornerstone of any democracy, no matter how many sensitive petals get their widdle feelings hurt.

Who do they think that they are kidding really? This is not about hurt feelings this is about domination. Islam wants to turn the west into a puppet that it controls. Charlie Hebdo have defiantly cut the strings and given them the finger. I support them 100%. No more, no more. Islam does not get to terrorise us into silence, because the day they succeed is the day that all our rights and privileges in our democracies end.

Many mainstream ( in other words moderate ) Muslims have said that the mere depiction of the prophet is a sacrilege.

Hang on one cotton picking minute. When did France become an Islamic state under Sharia law? Only under Sharia law is the depiction a sacrilege. Only if you are a Muslim is it sacrilege. The cartoonists are not Muslim.

Other religions equate sacrilege with breaking a moral and ethical code such as rape or murder or pedophilia. These are moral and ethical lines that most religions, faiths and non religious beliefs have in common. Only Islam refers to dogma or man made rules as things that are sacrilege to break. Think about this for one minute. Drawing a picture of Muhammad is sacrilege, marrying and having sex with a nine year old is not.

Claims that Islam is a “religion of peace” is a shameful lie

Douglas Murray at ?The Spectator explains why it is a shameful lie to describe any religion, but in particular Islam as a “religion of peace”.

The West?s movement towards the truth is remarkably slow. We drag ourselves towards it painfully, inch by inch, after each bloody Islamist assault.

In France, Britain, Germany, America and nearly every other country in the world it remains government policy to say that any and all attacks carried out in the name of Mohammed have ?nothing to do with Islam?. It was said by George W. Bush after 9/11, Tony Blair after 7/7 and Tony Abbott after the Sydney attack last month. It is what David Cameron said after two British extremists cut off the head of Drummer Lee Rigby in London, when ?Jihadi John? cut off the head of aid worker Alan Henning in the ?Islamic State? and when Islamic extremists attacked a Kenyan mall, separated the Muslims from the Christians and shot the latter in the head. And, of course, it is what President Fran?ois Hollande said after the massacre of journalists and Jews in Paris last week.

All these leaders are wrong. In private, they and their senior advisers often concede that they are telling a lie. The most sympathetic explanation is that they are telling a ?noble lie?, provoked by a fear that we ? the general public ? are a lynch mob in waiting. ?Noble? or not, this lie is a mistake. First, because the general public do not rely on politicians for their information and can perfectly well read articles and books about Islam for themselves. Secondly, because the lie helps no one understand the threat we face. Thirdly, because it takes any heat off Muslims to deal with the bad traditions in their own religion. And fourthly, because unless mainstream politicians address these matters then one day perhaps the public will overtake their politicians to a truly alarming extent.

If politicians are so worried about this secondary ?backlash? problem then they would do well to remind us not to blame the jihadists? actions on our peaceful compatriots and then deal with the primary problem ? radical Islam ? in order that no secondary, reactionary problem will ever grow.

We must confront radical Islam, otherwise it will grow.

Yet today our political class fuels both cause and nascent effect. Because the truth is there for all to see. To claim that people who punish people by killing them for blaspheming Islam while shouting ?Allah is greatest? has ?nothing to do with Islam? is madness. Because the violence of the Islamists is, truthfully, only to do with Islam: the worst version of Islam, certainly, but Islam nonetheless.

Last week, a chink was broken in this wall of disinformation when Sajid Javid, the only Muslim-born member of the British cabinet, and one of its brightest hopes, dipped a toe into this water. After the Paris attacks, he told the BBC: ?The lazy answer would be to say that this has got nothing whatsoever to do with Islam or Muslims and that should be the end of that. That would be lazy and wrong.? Sadly, he proceeded to utter the second most lazy thing one can say: ?These people are using Islam, taking a peaceful religion and using it as a tool to carry out their activities.?

How many times have we heard this? …from Obama, to Cameron, to many other politicians.

It is a lie. ? Read more »

Sean Hannity vs Anjem Choudary – Cleric Reveals Roots Of Terror Culture

Watch Sean Hannity debate Anjem Choudary, the mad imam from the UK, who wants and demands sharia law for all of the UK and indeed Europe.

Following the?horrific attack at the Paris offices of a satirical newspaper that left 12 people dead, radical Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary took to social media in defense of the killers? motivations.

Read more »

×