Australian Taxpayers Alliance

Carbon hypocrites outed in Australia

? Australian Taxpayers Alliance

Climate Change hypocrite abound, here in New Zealand we have our very own Gareth Hughes who will be in Kaitaia one day and Invercargill the next telling us all how we must mend our ways. In Australia the Australian Taxpayers Alliance has outed more such hypocrites:

Documents released to the Australian Taxpayers? Alliance under Freedom of Information laws revealed that bureaucrats in the Department of Climate change flew 6,528,616km last financial year, costing us a staggering $3,274,286.40!

And while these very people are lecturing us to act like we?re back in the dark ages the carbon emissions of these flights equal over 1000 tonnes!

The hypocrisy is staggering ? it?s one rule for them, and another rule for us. ?No wonder they are happy to slug airlines with the carbon tax ? they don?t have to pay the bill!?

So where were they flying to?

None other than the holiday resorts of Cancun, Vanuatu, Fiji, The Maldives, Grenada,?Miami, Barcelona? Must be tough having to travel to places like the?Caribbean & South Pacific all the time?

The actions of Department staff make one thing clear: the carbon tax isn?t about the environment, it?s about squeezing taxpayers for their own benefit.?

And of course, it?s only the best in luxury travel for our bureaucrats ? no expense is spared! Many of these flights cost the taxpayers up to?ten times?what an online economy class ticket would cost.

A round trip from Sydney to Bali cost?for one person?$15,311!!!!! I had a look on Jetstar just now, and you could get economy flight for under $700! Then there?s the flight to Seaul ($15,688.57), Thailand ($13,093.74pp for two people), Chile ($12,805.46)?

And this doesn?t even include accommodation: From $21,115.69 for a 5 star hotel in Thailand to the whopping $265,000 for the delegation in Durban.


Show us the money

? Sydney Morning Herald

Tim Andrews of the Australian Taxpayers Alliance writes in the Sydney Morning Herald:

In 2006, in the US, the senators John McCain and Barack Obama co-sponsored the US federal funding accountability act. Its premise was simple: that taxpayer expenditure be placed online in an easily searchable database, so all taxpayers can find out how their money has been spent.

Since then, the City of London, the European Union and 38 US states have enacted similar online portals – many with no thresholds, so every cent of taxpayer expenditure is publicly available. In some cases, literally every expense of government is made public after being entered into a database.

The benefits are obvious: not only are taxpayers empowered, but also savings can be easily identified, waste exposed and unethical behaviour discouraged. Those who want spending to remain hidden might argue that informing people is too costly, that it just cannot be done. But international experience proves this to be false. The website, which provides the details of all US federal government expenditure of more than $US25,000 ($25,800), cost less than $1 million to set up – and the software is now available free of charge in the public domain.

Texas, with a population greater than that of Australia, was able to create a spending portal for $380,000, and Nebraska did it for only $30,000. Such minor costs are nothing compared with the benefits such portals bring.

What agreat idea, we need something like this here. The Taxpayers Alliance in Australia is making similar calls:

It is time Australia joined this revolution. Everywhere that transparency portals have been tried, the results to date have been breathtaking. Citizens have been searching these websites in record numbers. In Missouri, with a population smaller than NSW, 15 million hits were reported in the first year. Millions in savings have been identified. To use just one example, Texas reported $8.7 million in savings directly attributable to their transparency website in just the first year of operation.

Opening the government books to an army of online citizen investigators has uncovered waste and duplication, and made junkets or pork-barrel spending near impossible. Corruption and rorting cannot occur when the records are freely available – sunlight truly is the best disinfectant.

Such portals should be a ”no-brainer” for policymakers. This is not a partisan issue – people on all sides of politics should agree that empowering citizens through transparency can only lead to higher outcomes. There is no logical argument to oppose their creation, unless you have something to hide.

Once the cost argument crumbles, the only opposition to transparency portals can come from vested interests seeking to preserve their misuse of taxpayer funds.

The lobbyists and vested interests of course oppose such transparency:

It is time our politicians stood up for the average taxpayer against these special interest groups and rent-seekers, and called for the establishment of transparency portals at all levels of government.

The Australian Taxpayers’ Alliance is calling for all politicians and political candidates to publicly pledge their commitment to taxpayers by supporting this initiative. If they truly represent their electors, and are not beholden to other influences, if they truly have nothing to hide, they should support it without hesitation.

Would our own politicians make a similar pledge?