Guest Post: Our world: The PLO?s zero-sum game

Caroline Glick

AN AERIAL view of the Palestinian Authority?s Mukata presidential compound in Ramallah.. (photo credit:REUTERS)

The opportunity now upon us may be lost forever as the PLO comes back to win its zerosum game against Israel.

Since its inception in the?late 1970s, the Israeli peace movement has been based on one thing: hope.
Members of the peace movement hoped the PLO?s war with Israel could be resolved through compromise. Proponents of peace with the PLO hoped that Yasser Arafat and his terrorist minions weren?t truly committed to Israel?s destruction.

The two-state formula was based on the hope that Israel could reach an accommodation with the PLO. To wit, in exchange for parts of Judea and Samaria and Gaza (no one was talking about Jerusalem), Israeli peaceniks, who over time came to encompass all factions of the Left in Israel, hoped the PLO would bury the hatchet, build a state, or federate with Jordan, and that would be that.

In 1992, the peace camp took over the government. Under the leadership of then prime minister Yitzhak Rabin and then foreign minister Shimon Peres, hope became the basis for Israel?s national security strategy. That strategy was followed by every Israeli government since. The basic idea was clear enough. In exchange for land and guns and legitimacy, Arafat and his goons would be domesticated.

Read more »

Democrats hypocrisy knows no bounds

After demanding for months that Donald Trump abide by the?election?night results and concede when he lost the Democrats are now trying to get the defeated candidate to call for a recount.

Hillary Clinton is being urged to call for a recount in three crucial states where some experts believe results may have been hacked.

Voting-rights lawyer John Bonifaz and prominent computer scientist J Alex Halderman of the University of Michigan, are part of a group of experts who believe results in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked, New York Magazine reports.

The group is lobbying Clinton’s team to request an independent review as soon as possible, to count the paper ballots and compare them to the electronic results.

While the group did not find evidence of hacking, their analysis found Clinton received 7 per cent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines, compared to areas that used optical scanners and paper ballots.

They believe this may have cost Clinton up to 30,000 votes, a potentially game-changing number if you consider she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. ? Read more »

The Blame game in America has reached peak stupidity



Who you gonna Blame for the Orlando Islamic terrorist attack?

Scapegoat number ONE: The?NRA

“The greatest threat to our homeland security today is the National Rifle Association, a front group for the firearms industry?that?derails gun-safety measures and perversely profits with each new mass shooting.”

Scapegoat number TWO:Christians

‘”The ISIS thing is a distraction,? Katz says, arguing that we should instead be ?looking at the long legacy of anti-gay violence in this country that has itself been stoked and promoted by the Christian right.? The central problem, he says, is not to be found in ?the Middle East,? but at home where the ?homophobia problem? exists.’

Scapegoat number THREE: Gun control

“Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, who said blame for mass shootings lies with Congress for its failure to enact stricter gun control measures.”

Scapegoat number FOUR: The Republican Party

?This was an American killing Americans because they were queer and that has not been forcefully articulated,? Jonathan Katz said in a news release put out by the school. ?What we are trying to do here is camouflage the root of the problem, which is a long history of violent political rhetoric and homophobic policies by Republican officials and their conservative allies.”

Scapegoat number FIVE: Gays?

?The LGBT cause has blood on its hands. These deaths were caused by a paradoxical alliance between the left and Islam”

Read more »

Learning this one historical fact about politics explains so much about the Left

Until recently I was ignorant about the origins of America’s two main political parties. I knew that the Democrats were similar to our Labour party and the Republicans were similar to our National party. They have other parties but, because they do not have MMP, the tail never gets the opportunity to wag the dog like it does here in New Zealand.

So, many of the Democrat’s policies confused me because, to my conservative and libertarian eyes, they were patronising and racist. It turns out that there is a very good historical reason for the way they treat their Black American supporters.

Read more »

“Woman of the year” experiences Leftie intolerance

Caitlyn Jenner, who used to be Bruce Jenner, was named ?Woman of the Year”.?This shocked conservatives who thought that a biological woman should have won. Lefties, on the other hand, were in ecstasy because…diversity. Equal rights for transgenders etc. Now though, Bruce Caitlyn Jenner has confused the lefties who don’t know whether or not they can support him her anymore.

You know how lefties support Islam, despite its appalling treatment of women, children and gays, because it ticks the boxes of persecution, (Islamophobia) racism, (Islamophobia) and refugees/migrants? Well,?Bruce Caitlyn ticks a lot of boxes but he she has done something far worse than Islam has ever done. He?She has attacked Hillary Clinton, saying that she?doesn?t care about women.

Caitlyn Jenner arrives at the Vanity Fair Oscar Party in Beverly Hills, California February 28, 2016. REUTERS/Danny Moloshok - RTS8HXI

Caitlyn Jenner arrives at the Vanity Fair Oscar Party in Beverly Hills, California February 28, 2016. REUTERS/Danny Moloshok – RTS8HXI

Read more »

No suprises here: NRA more popular than Democrats

Truth Revolt reports:

The Democrats’ attempt to demonize America’s most prominent gun rights group doesn’t seem to be working.?It apparently is vastly more popular than even the Dems’?two most prominent figures.

According to a new Gallup Poll,?58 percent of Americans surveyed said they have a favorable view of the National Rifle Association, while 35 percent said they have an unfavorable view,?says Fox News.

Compare this to recent approval ratings for President Obama?and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who recently announced that she would support tougher gun laws if?elected President.

According to a Gallup Poll between Oct.19-21, just under 50 percent approve of Obama?s job performance, while 45 percent disapprove. Meanwhile, in an NBC/Wall Street Journalsurvey of Americans taken Oct. 15-18, 39 percent of those surveyed had a favorable view of Clinton, compared to 48 percent with an unfavorable view. ? Read more »

If maps kill people…

The screw loose useful idiots of the left wing are desperately trying to prove that a map made someone kill some and therefore?the?gun was vicariously in Sarah Palins hand.

This is the image they say put the target onto Arizona representative Gabrielle Giffords:

Sarah Palin PAC map

Now to use their correlation, that maps kill people, then we can similarly hold the Democrats responsible for killing their own representative because this mp is from their own Heartland Strategy:

Democrat Heartland Strategy Map

Democrats use "bulls eye" targets extensively in their political graphics. This map shows states Democrats want targeted. Arizona, which Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords represents, is surrounded by these targets.

As you can see the Democrats have “killed” their own with their map. This argument is of course ludicrous but it is the argument that the nutters at The Standard and other left wing sites are trying to pull….that somehow maps cause people to kill and that therefore puts the gun into the hands of the map creator or owner.

We can now re-write the old saying that guns don’t kill people, maps do.

The only person responsible for this terrible killing and attempted assassination is the insane person behind the trigger, no one else. It is ludicrous to suggest otherwise. And I don’t even care what his politics are. He is just plain nuts thinking shooting people is going to solve anything.

I know one thing for sure though. He is not a Tea party supporter…in one of his videos he is shooting up and then burning a US flag. Patriots don’t do that…ever.

What does $16 get you?

A few coins for a tax cutSixteen bucks a week tax cut! That is what Labour has delivered after nine years in government.

Let’s take a look at what that gets you. Remeber with your tax cut you can only choose ONE of these per week.

Petrol: 8 litres! Whoopee (drive real slow to make that last)

Meat: 750g of Sirloin

Chicken: Tegel chicken whole size 22 plain

Milk:12l home brand milk blue top standard

Bread: 4 loaves of tip top up sandwich bread mighty white

Cheese: 1kg (not 2) mainland cheese block tasty

Marmite: 3x500g

Butter: 3x500g (better spread it real thin)

Oh god, this is getting depressing and to think this is the best those numpties could do after nine long, hard years. As you can see Michael Cullen’s tax cut when applied to essentials gets you fuck all and not much else.

Basically if you want a toasted sandwich you have to buy the cheese in week one and then the butter in week two and the bread in week 3 all without putting any petrol in the car!!!