Islamic Supremacists

That awkward moment when you realise a Sharia Law advocate organised a Women’s rights march

Did you hear the joke about the paedophile that organised the children’s rights march?

What about the one about the butcher who organised the vegetarian food festival?

My favourite has to be the Sharia law advocate that organised a Women’s rights march…

You’ll also know when you’re living under Sharia law when you get arrested for adultery after being raped. Doesn’t sound very nice, does it?

A Sharia law activist promoting women’s rights is like [email protected]#ing for virginity. It is utterly insane. Under Sharia law, the only rights woman have are the right to be exploited, dominated, controlled and to be valued as having half the worth of a man.

Read more »

American’s first Amendment rights violated by Social Media companies

maxresdefault-3

This month the American Freedom Law Center (AFLC) filed a?federal lawsuit?in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) under the First Amendment.

Center for Security Policy? Section 230 provides immunity from lawsuits to Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, thereby permitting these social media giants to engage in government-sanctioned censorship and discriminatory business practices free from legal challenge.

The lawsuit was brought on behalf of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, and Jihad Watch. The lawsuit alleges that Spencer and Geller as well as the organisations they run, have often been subject to discrimination and censorship by twitter Facebook and YouTube because of the beliefs and views they express. They believe the censorship and discrimination is because these social media organisations consider their freedom of expression to be offensive to Muslims.

Read more »

Let’s talk about hate and the SPLC

The AP suggests the mounting accusations against the group may indicate this sort of error is increasingly common on the part of the SPLC, citing the Carson incident as evidence even the SPLC is aware ?its labels aren?t always foolproof.?

The SPLC is so extreme in its views and ideology that it labels concerns about inadequate screening for ISIS members as being anti-Muslim. By attacking the very groups who are attempting to defend America from terrorism, it is making the American people a target.

The SPLC has begun to blame the rise of jihadi terrorism in America on alleged anti-Muslim talking points from Republican presidential candidates and groups like the CSP, who track jihadist organizations operating against the United States. The candidates almost unanimously agree that the United States should not be taking in refugees from the civil war in Syria, due to the fact that there is no way to screen them out from being potential Islamic State members. The SPLC has labeled their concerns over the safety of Americans ?anti-Muslim,?

…Frank Gaffney, the President and Founder of CSP, firmly rejects the SPLC?s labeling of his defense think tank.

?For 25 years, the Center has worked to secure freedom against those who hate it, including Islamic supremacists, who explicitly seek to suppress free speech and ultimately destroy our constitutional republic and every form of government other than sharia law,?

-breitbart.com

?The SPLC ?has not limited its destructive influence to costing people their jobs and smearing politicians and defence groups. It has crossed the line into putting people’s lives in danger. One of these people is Pamela Geller. The SPLC has labelled Pamela as an “Islamophobe” and a “hatemonger” which has encouraged more Jihad killers to come after her. In reality, every person that the SPLC labels as an Islamophobe and ?hatemonger is being put on a literal Jihad hit list.

Read more »

Some inconvenient facts about Islamic immigration

Lets take away all the emotion and look at the actual effects on Western Countries when they encourage Islamic immigration and take in Islamic refugees. We all know what we can do to help the Muslims as the bleeding heart Liberals tell us all the time while also telling us how heartless and?soul less?we are for worrying about?the economic, societial and political effect on our countries.

The actual effect of Islamic immigration into Western societies is:

  1. They don’t assimilate or integrate into the society.

Hindus, Buddhists, South Asians, Africans?all kinds of people have come to the U.K. and the U.S. and had little trouble adapting to their new country. But Muslims are the first group to come as immigrants to the West determined to replace Western government and social structures with Islamic ones. Millions of Muslims come to Western countries with a ready-made model of society and government (sharia) which they believe to be superior to what we have here, and they work to institute it.

Victorian Islamic college in Australia bans girls from running over virginity concerns. Photo: YouTube screen shot

Victorian Islamic college in Australia bans girls from running over virginity concerns. Photo: YouTube screen shot

Read more »