Islamophobia

Canada passes Anti-Free speech motion M103 to protect Islam from criticism

It is with a heavy heart that I report that Canada has passed motion M103 which will restrict free speech and will morph very quickly into a Sharia enforcement tool. The thought police now have a motion to use to silence any Canadian who criticises Islam as Islamophobia is now officially condemned. No clear definition of what Islamophobia actually is has been provided. How can this motion be fairly applied when no definition of Islamophobia has been provided? The lack of a definition makes it open season on any critic of the ideology of Islam. It is an incredibly totalitarian motion and will result eventually in Canadians being sent to jail for criticising Islam. It will also have a chilling effect so people will be too scared to say anything related to Muslims or Islam.

The Canadian House of Commons has passed motion M103 which singles out the criticism of Islam as a form of ?Islamophobia?. Critics condemn it as an attack on free speech.
Motion M103 was tabled by Iqra Khalid, a Muslim member of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau?s Liberal Party. It?states the government must ?condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination?, was taken to vote on Thursday evening where a total of 201 MPs voted for it and only 91 voted against, Canadian broadcaster Global News reports.

The text of the motion does not clarify what constitutes ?Islamophobia? and has led many to speculate what that may mean in the future, with some critics fearing it could lead to Shariah law courts. This concern has led to the circulation of an anti-Shariah petition on the Parliament of Canada website, which has so far been signed by over 24,000 people.

Even in London where people have just been slaughtered by a homegrown Jihadist, critics of the terror attack are being accused of hate speech. Instead of focussing on the ideology that all the terrorism has in common the media and the liberals are attacking the critics. The message in Canada and the UK is that the citizens must stop complaining about the destruction that Islam brings into their societies as it is hateful and Islamophobic to do so.

Read more »

Blasphemy laws are the foundation of an authoritarian state

Pakistani Christian villagers march during a protest against the country’s strict blasphemy laws against Islam. Getty images

Pakistan is a?Muslim country and when they introduced blasphemy laws they said they were created to protect people’s religious beliefs but the laws resulted in public death sentences. Naive Canada is being led down the same garden path by a leader known more for his boyish good looks than his common sense. He has introduced motions against “Islamophobia” that are not legally binding but Muslim extremists are already agitating for them to become laws.

A resolution, M-103, seeking to condemn so-called “Islamophobia,” was introduced a few weeks ago in the peaceful country of Canada by Liberal Party MP Iqra Khalid in the House of Commons, sparking a controversy.

A similar motion, labelled M-37, was later tabled in the Ontario provincial legislature by MPP Nathalie Des Rosiers on February 23, 2017, and was passed by the provincial parliament.

M-37, like its predecessor, demanded that lawmakers condemn “all forms of Islamophobia” and reaffirm “support for government efforts, through the Anti-Racism Directorate, to address and prevent systemic racism across government policy, programs and services”…

There are, of course, no comparable motions against “Judeophobia” or “Christianophobia”.

Read more »

Canadians from Iran and Pakistan don’t support Canadian Blasphemy law

Islamophobia is because of misinformation apparently

PHOTO-facebook

While I appreciate New Zealander,?Mustenser Qamar’s desire?to spread a peaceful message about Islam because he?practices a peaceful version of it I think that it is a bridge too far to blame misinformation for Islamophobia. Fear of Islam is well justified. I fear Islamic colonisation and the implementation of Sharia?law way more than I fear Islamic terrorism. Terrorism creates fear but Islamification changes a country’s way of life forever. How a relatively low Muslim population changes a Western country for the worse is backed up by examples all over Europe. It is not misinformation. Some Maori and NZ academics still go on about the evils of British colonialism yet no one accuses them of Pomophobia or of being victims of misinformation.

Unfortunately, 5 young women of our community were verbally and physically attacked yesterday in Huntly. The video went viral… This clearly happened because of misunderstandings about #TrueIslam
The perpetrator was also a victim…A victim of misinformation!


Ironically, these young women had just been actively countering the misinformation and misunderstanding about Islam. These women were at the forefront of our initiative to educate the public on #TrueIslam over the weekend and took part in our community’s efforts and arrangements for a Quran Exhibition in New Plymouth on Saturday.
On the way back home after a very successful weekend in which our community was educating people and removing misconceptions through the exhibition, short seminars on ‘Quran and Terrorism’, radio interviews, news coverage, a bookstall, peace message letter box drops and even working on YouTube videos for #MeetAMuslimNZ these girls were attacked due to the exact thing they were out fighting….misinformation!

This just goes to show that Islamophobia is real and is increasing. Our initiatives are more important than ever! People really need to actually #MeetAMuslimNZ and find out what the #TrueIslam of the Quran and the Prophet Muhammad (peace be on him) is.

Don’t judge us on the ‘so-called Islam’ of the extremists… judge us on the Islam we practice; the Islam of the Quran and the Islam of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be on him).

So take the opportunity to accept the invitation of our community WORLDWIDE! Meet a Muslim! Get in touch with me or anyone in our community anywhere in the world and we can make it happen. We can build friendships and work for a more peaceful, loving, accepting and tolerant world through education.

COME AND MEET US BEFORE YOU JUDGE US!

Share this and feel free to PM me for a meet up wherever in the world you maybe!

-Mustenser Qamar?Facebook

Facts versus feelings: A case study

through-rose-tinted-glasses

through-rose-tinted-glasses

A progressive liberal who grew up in a conservative household allowed his curiosity to open him up to new ideas. Instead of sticking to liberal dogma he started reading and watching things that exposed him to another way of viewing what was happening in America.The fact-based arguments were changing his attitudes but they made him feel uncomfortable. He didn’t like viewing the world that way and thought that he had become an ” arsehole. ” He didn’t want to be an ” arsehole, ” so he put his rose tinted glasses back on so that he could feel like a good person.

He retreated to a world dominated by feelings. The only way he could live with his regression was to view the facts and the logical persuasive arguments in a negative light. Amazingly in his article about his 180 degree turnaround he chose to label the other side ” indoctrination” and “online radicalisation.”

He reminds me of someone I knew who was constantly used as a doormat by others. I told her what she had to do to protect herself but she wasn’t prepared to do it because she would feel like a bad person. It is amazing how much people will put up with and ignore in order to preserve their image of themselves as a good person.

Read more »

The Western Double Standard: Protect Islam Ridicule Christianity

1974

 

One of the above costumes was removed from Amazon because of complaints about it. Amazon was accused of?using “a religious garment for commercial purposes.” A religious garment being used as a costume was considered offensive by the complainants. The wrath of a higher deity was even mentioned by those opposing the costume. Amazon removed the costume using the excuse that it didn’t follow their selling guidelines but they left the other costume for sale so clearly they were lying about the real reason why it was removed.

 

The world’s biggest shopping portal, Amazon, sells many Halloween costumes. One of the novelties in 2016 has been the “Sexy Burka”

…The commercial colossus of Jeff Bezos removed the item from the website, after Amazon had been swamped with accusations of “racism”, “Islamophobia,” of marketing an Islamic garment with the white face of a model and using “a religious garment for commercial purposes”. “You are disgusting, my culture is not your costume”, wrote many users of the Islamic faith. Others used a less adorable tone: “Whoever you are, you should fear Allah. This is not a joke.”

A spokesman for Amazon promptly responded: “All Marketplace sellers must follow our selling guidelines and those who don’t will be subject to action including potential removal of their account. The product in question is no longer available”.

So that Halloween parody of the global symbol of female oppression has been censored.

Read more »

Australian Muslim Activist decided to prove that the poll results were wrong

I wrote recently about a poll in Australia?where the question was posed, ?Do you support banning Muslim Immigration??. The not surprising result (given what has been happening in Australia)?was that 49% Australians said ” Yes.” Like with Brexit a lot of Lefties were not happy with the result of the poll and blamed the result on the fact that only 1,000 people were polled. A second poll was taken?but it got?exactly the same result.

What?s happened next was fascinating. Mariam Veiszadeh, of ?Islamaphobia Register of Australia? infamy, refused to believe the results so commissioned her own poll on Twitter. She proposed exactly the same question and more than 40,000 people have responded to the poll.

Read more »

Sweating and chanting couple asked to leave aircraft

When it comes to suspicious?behaviour this couple raised four red flags but as usual CAIR, the well-funded?American centre of Islamic legal jihad has gone into bat for them. I believe that CAIR’s?intention, in this case, is the same as their intention when they defended ” Clock boy”, the Muslim boy who scared his teachers by bringing what looked like a bomb to school. CAIR want to make people too frightened of crippling legal fees to take action when a Muslim does something suspicious.

It is already working as after a number of terrorist attacks neighbours and workmates of the terrorists have told media that they were suspicious of the actions of the terrorist but didn’t say anything because they didn’t want to be labelled racists.

…Faisal Ali and his wife, Nazia had boarded a Cincinnati bound Delta Air Lines flight in Paris, France. The plane sat on the tarmac for about 45 minutes. During that time, several flight attendants noticed that the husband was sweating, hiding his phone, and that both he and his wife were chanting ?Allah? repeatedly. It made the flight attendants uncomfortable, reports the Independent UK.

Read more »

Lone gunman’s actions blamed on Donald Trump before any facts are known

screenshot-whaleoil.co.nz

screenshot-whaleoil.co.nz

A terrible double murder where two men were shot in the back of the head by a lone gunman has shown a very different side to a media usually very reluctant to speculate on motivation or to blame anyone until the facts are known.

The Media has rarely allowed blame to be put on the teachings of Islam or on any hate preacher who has preached violent jihad against infidels even after the facts are known, yet it was not slow to use selected quotes in order to slander the one politician trying to do something practical to protect America from terrorism. By the time this post is published more facts may be available but when I wrote it late Sunday afternoon there was still only speculation.

Read more »

Cartoon removed by media organisation because it offends Muslims

warning_offensive_1024x1024

WARNING: If you would be offended by viewing a cartoon that mocks ISIS do not click “view more”. If seeing a cartoon that shows an ISIS terrorist praying in the Muslim way offends you please do not look over the break. If satire based on the evolution of man but reversed in order to show an ISIS terrorist as the lowest of the low offends you please do not look over the break.?If making a link between ISIS, the Islamic religion and Islamic prayer offends you please do not read any further.

The following (after the break) editorial cartoon has been removed by the Chicago Tribune due to complaints made by Muslim leaders. Titled ?De-evolution?, the image by Michael Ramirez parodied the iconic ?March of Progress? illustration (below), which shows human evolution as a series of figures evolving from apelike ancestors to modern humans standing erect.

In a letter of complaint to the newspaper,?Ahmed Rehab of the terrorist-linked and Saudi-Arabia-funded group CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) said…

?It makes it as if ISIS is just your average, mainstream Muslim who?s prostrating in prayer ?? something we all do ? as opposed to what is unique and problematic about them,??

?The cartoon does a great disservice to Muslims and promotes further Islamophobia,?

What he failed to mention was that the ISIS terrorist was clearly drawn as a terrorist because of his clothing and weapon. He actually has the word ISIS on his back in case there was any doubt as to whom the cartoonist was referring. The praying man was clearly not a moderate Muslim. ISIS terrorists do pray and they consider themselves Muslim even if other Muslims that they slaughter do not. Like it or not, it is relevant to portray one as praying since they justify all their atrocities as being for Allah and they claim that their actions are sanctioned by the Koran and Hadith.

No doubt with the slaughter of the cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo in mind, the Chicago Tribune were quick to remove the cartoon from their website.

?We understand the deep concerns about Michael Ramirez? cartoon and have moved quickly to publish responses from Islamic leaders and other readers that reflect those concerns,?

-John McCormick, Editorial Page Editor

In a free country both the cartoon and the letters of complaint would be allowed to stand side by side. America, sadly, is no longer the land of the free. At least, not where the Chicago Tribune are concerned.

zallinger-ascent-of-man

Read more »

×