James Lovelock

Climate Change warrior recants

The Guardian has an article about James Lovelock, one of the major proponents of global warming, climate change or whatever they are calling the fraud now.

He has recanted.

James Lovelock?s parting words last time we met were: ?Enjoy life while you can. Because if you?re lucky, it?s going to be 20 years before it hits the fan.? It was early 2008, and the distinguished scientist was predicting imminent and irreversible global warming, which would soon make large parts of the planet uninhabitably hot or put them underwater. The fashionable hope that windfarms or recycling could prevent global famine and mass migration was, he assured me, a fantasy; it was too late for ethical consumption to save us. Before the end of this century, 80% of the world?s population would be wiped out.

Wow, bold predictions.

His predictions were not easy to forget or dismiss. Sometimes described as a futurist, Lovelock has been Britain?s leading independent scientist for more than 50 years. His Gaia hypothesis, which contends that the earth is a single, self-regulating organism, is now accepted as the founding principle of most climate science, and his invention of a device to detect CFCs helped identify the hole in the ozone layer. A defiant generalist in an era of increasingly specialised study, and a mischievous provocateur, Lovelock is regarded by many as a scientific genius.

[…] ? Read more »

After years of opposing nuclear power the Green taliban Australia are coming around to it

After decades of telling us nuclear power is evil, despite more people dying in Ted Kennedy’s car than in US nuclear accidents, the green taliban have now worked out that nuclear power is the only truly green power solution.

Now in Australia the green taliban are realising that they really need to embrace nuclear power if they are to come even close to maintaining our lifestyle and reduce emissions.

ALARMISTS like Jay Weatherill now finally admit nuclear power isn?t actually a terrifying mass-killing menace.

Now they say we need nuclear to stop their latest terrifying mass-killing menace ? global warming.

Can you believe these guys? Nuclear power has switched from our greatest threat to greatest saviour. Yet none of these hypesters has said sorry for having peddled such baseless scares.

Take Weatherill, South Australia?s Labor Premier. As a budding politician he was ??opposed to nuclear power, all elements of it?, but this week said he?d changed his mind.

Now he was calling a royal commission to ?consider what role our state can potentially play in the fuel cycle for the peaceful use of nuclear energy?. See, Weatherill reckons a nuclear industry might help save his struggling state.

The most obvious money-spinner would be a nuclear waste facility, like one Pangea tried to sell in 1999 that would have earned us $2 billion a year.

It makes sense. We have the stable geology and stable government to store the world?s nuclear waste, safe from earthquakes and terrorists.

But such facts never used to count with the likes of the unapologetic Weatherill. Such alarmists instead mounted the usual scare against Pangea and ran it out of town. Pangea couldn?t even get interviews with the young Howard government. ? Read more »

James Lovelock on the Green Taliban and the emergence of their ‘religion’

wind turbines

James Lovelock is the inventor of Gaia theory and the father of modern environmentalism. The Guardian interviews him and finds that he is recanting.?He discusses nuclear (good), wind power (bad) and why fracking is the future.

On sea level rises:

After more than three decades living amid acres of trees he planted himself by hand, he and his wife Sandy have decided to downsize and move to an old lifeguard’s cottage by the beach in Dorset. “I’m not worried about sea-level rises,” he laughs. “At worst, I think it will be 2ft a century.”

Read more »

Go mad for Fracking – Lovelock

? The Guardian

I wrote about the turn around in attitude of James Lovelock recently, now he has come out in favour of fracking:

The experience altered his attitude to the politics and economics of?energy. Having already upset many environmentalists ? for whom he is something of a guru ? with his long-time support for?nuclear power?and his hatred of wind power (he has a picture of a wind turbine on the wall of his study to remind him how “ugly and useless they are”), he is now coming out in favour of “fracking”, the controversial technique for extracting natural?gas?from the ground. He argues that, while not perfect, it produces far less CO2 than burning coal: “Gas is almost a give-away in the US at the moment. They’ve gone for fracking in a big way. Let’s be pragmatic and sensible and get Britain to switch everything to methane. We should be going mad on it.”

The First Apology?


The great global arming swindle is coming to an end, and the cracks are beginning to appear in the edifice. When former alarmists are starting to apologise and of their own volition then I believe we have progress:

James Lovelock, the maverick scientist who became a guru to the environmental movement with his ?Gaia? theory of the Earth as a single organism, has admitted to being ?alarmist? about climate change and?says other environmental commentators, such as?Al Gore, were too.

Lovelock, 92, is writing a new book in which he will say climate change is still happening, but not as quickly as he once feared.

He?previously painted some of the direst visions of the effects of climate change.?In 2006,?in an article in the U.K.?s Independent newspaper, he wrote that ?before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable.?

It was this sort of alarmism that made reasonable arguments for mitigation get swamped int he race for the worst possible headlines.

?The problem is we don?t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books ? mine included ? because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn?t happened,? Lovelock said.

?The climate is doing its usual tricks. There?s nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now,? he said.

?The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time? it (the temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising — carbon dioxide is rising, no question about that,? he added.

He pointed to Gore?s ?An Inconvenient Truth? and Tim Flannery?s ?The Weather Makers? as other examples of ?alarmist? forecasts of the future.

Finally someone from the alarmist team has called bullshit on Al Gore. I await his apology.

Asked if he was now a climate skeptic, Lovelock told msnbc.com: ?It depends what you mean by a skeptic. I?m not a denier.?

He said human-caused carbon dioxide emissions were driving an increase in the global temperature, but added that the effect of the oceans was not well enough understood and could have a key role.

?It (the sea) could make all the difference between a hot age and an ice age,? he said.

He said he still thought that climate change was happening, but that its effects would be felt farther in the future than he previously thought.

?We will have global warming, but it?s been deferred a bit,? Lovelock said.

As ?an independent and a loner,? he said he did not mind saying ?All right, I made a mistake.? He claimed a university or government scientist might fear an admission of a mistake would lead to the loss of funding.

And there is James Lovelock’s apology. Now let’s hear some more.