muslim immigration

The UN responsible for changing New Zealand’s immigration policy

A politically correct opinion piece on Islamic immigration to New Zealand in The Dominion Post got lots of comments. Interestingly despite the politically correct stance taken by the writer the majority of commenters disagreed with what he said. It made me realise that Whaleoil readers are not the only New Zealanders who can see what folly it is to import a culture, religion and political ideology so at odds with everything we hold dear. We are not the only New Zealanders who have observed what happens in other Western countries when they import an ideology that thinks homosexuals should be killed, that women are second class and that want to spread their laws and values to New Zealand rather than assimilate to our laws and values.

The article interested me because it inadvertently explained that we had a sensible immigration policy until the United Nations put pressure on our government. Believe it or not, our governments all had sensible immigration policies until the United Nations opened New Zealand up to Muslim immigration.

…Discrimination on the basis of ethnicity and religion characterised New Zealand’s immigration and refugee policy until the late 1980s. The country wanted British immigrants. Small numbers of refugees from the Middle East began arriving in New Zealand from the late 1970s, comprising people of Baha’i and Christian backgrounds.

Read more »

In Europe, voters and governments don’t see eye to eye about Muslim immigration

Voters will force this on their governments, one by one.  No matter how many times the liberal media call those who want to halt Muslim immigration racists, nationalists, extremists, far-right and neo-Nazi, the truth is that the majority of voters agree. Read more »

Islamic immigration explained

Almost half of all Australians want a ban on Muslim immigrants

1-plymouth-rock-agenda-setting

1-plymouth-rock-agenda-setting

Do you think the Aborigines,the Maori and the American Indians were happy about British immigration into their countries? The difference between those indigenous cultures and ours in Australia and New Zealand is that the power is in our hands. Unlike those cultures we can limit who we let into our country and prevent them from becoming the dominant culture.

Australia is an immigrant country but its blend of cultures up until now have assimilated to the dominant Australian culture. They share many values and believe in democracy and equal rights. Even though Australia does not face the same issues as Europe our nearest neighbour is already extremely worried as this latest poll shows.

…poll showing almost half of all Australians want a ban on Muslim immigrants.

Forty-nine per cent of people surveyed in an Essential poll agreed that Muslims should be blocked from the country while 40 per cent disagreed with the idea. There was 60 per cent support for the ban among coalition voters, 40 per cent from Labor and a surprising 34 per cent from Greens voters.

More than a third felt Muslims did not integrate into Australian society as their main reason for supporting a ban, with some citing concerns about terrorism and lack of uptake of Australian values, the poll showed.

Read more »

More Buddhists, no cry

Bob Marley’s had it right in his song “No woman, no cry.” If you remove certain people from the equation there is less chance of tears. On the other hand, if you add certain people to the equation who have no impact on your life so there is no chance of tears either. There are more Buddhists at the moment percentage wise in Australia but it is the smaller Muslim population that is getting all the press coverage.

News.com.au recently tried to counter statements made by Pauline Hanson in her maiden speech by pointing out that there are more Buddhists than Muslims in Australia. However, the article only helped to make Hanson’s points about the problem with Islam. If Muslims are suffering from “racism” and “marginalisation” why aren’t Buddhists?

News.com.au, the Left-wing branch of the Murdoch empire here, writes:PAULINE Hanson wants Australians to face a reality check about Muslim immigration but a closer look at her claims show they don’t quite add up.

Read more »

Rampant anti-semitism from Muslim immigrants not ethnic Swedes

The Swedish government is allowing hundreds of thousands of people who hate the Jews into their country. They are allowing them to Islamize Sweden. Muslims numbers are rising fast and approaching one million while only 20,000 Jews live in Sweden. The future for Swedish Jews looks grim. The Swedish government is creating a society where Jews and Christians may be forced to live as dhimmis [subjugated citizens.] 

One of the most visible effects of Muslim mass immigration into Sweden is that anti-Semitism is very much on the rise in the country. Swedish Jews are being harassed and threatened, mainly in the Muslim-dense city of Malmö

The harassment of Malmö’s Jews was, for a long time, a mystery to the general public; Were neo-Nazis really walking the streets of Sweden’s third largest city? Many believed that to be the case, until the local daily paper Skånska Dagbladet published a series of articles, in which the Jewish community finally pointed out the elephant in the room: Malmö’s growing Muslim population.

Read more »

A smart Political Party would keep New Zealand safe

Screen Shot 2016-08-03 at 11.06.27 PM

Why are we so safe?

Read more »

Question six: Do you feel that Muslim immigration will become a serious problem for NZ?

immigration1

My motivation for creating a survey on immigration was to get an accurate snapshot of what a  Conservative/ Libertarian voter  thinks about immigration in New Zealand. I wanted this snap shot  primarily for David Seymour  as he commented that the small changes Act had proposed for immigration did not gain any support from this blog and resulted in a lot of negativity from the media.

Winston Peters of course has always been vocal about immigration, I hope this survey gives him some insight on what our real concerns about immigration are. Are we anti-immigration? Or do we think immigration is a good thing?

John Key likes to implement policies that will be popular with voters so he too should find this survey useful.I think he will be surprised at what it shows.

Due to our large audience we easily surveyed over one thousand voters in less than a day. This survey is not of the general population but of a specific conservative/libertarian audience. I gave two yes options and two no options for every  question.

Here are the results for question six: Do you feel that Muslim immigration will become a serious problem for NZ?

Read more »

Question five: Is immigration good for New Zealand?

immigration1

My motivation for creating a survey on immigration was to get an accurate snapshot of what a  Conservative/ Libertarian voter  thinks about immigration in New Zealand. I wanted this snap shot  primarily for David Seymour  as he commented that the small changes Act had proposed for immigration did not gain any support from this blog and resulted in a lot of negativity from the media.

Winston Peters of course has always been vocal about immigration, I hope this survey gives him some insight on what our real concerns about immigration are. Are we anti-immigration? Or do we think immigration is a good thing?

John Key likes to implement policies that will be popular with voters so he too should find this survey useful.I think he will be surprised at what it shows.

Due to our large audience we easily surveyed over one thousand voters in less than a day. This survey is not of the general population but of a specific conservative/libertarian audience. I gave two yes options and two no options for every  question.

Here are the results for question five: Is immigration good for New Zealand?

Read more »

Tolerance, in excess, is treason

via Facebook

via Facebook

New Zealand’s annual refugee intake of 750 was disgracefully low. An intake of 1000 is not much better. A doubling of the level, to 1500, as urged by Amnesty International and the Labour and Green parties, ought to be possible. The Minister of Immigration, Michael Woodhouse, points to the cost of ongoing support for those already admitted, many of whom are said to be still struggling to find work even after being here for up to 10 years. Doubtless a doubling of the number would mean much more than doubling the cost of refugee resettlement over the next 10 years. But the world is facing a wave of people fleeing from the upheaval in Muslim countries and all decent countries need to provide asylum for those in genuine danger.

I have no problem with the concept of refugees, or even the doubling of a quota, in spite of it being nothing more than a box to tick for Helen Clark’s run at the big chair at the UN. Read more »