NZ Police Association

Laws: Arm the Police

Michael Laws says it is time to arm the police and also?dispels?some myths around the recent incident in Dargaville:

Every time?a police officer is brutally attacked in this country – be they shot, stabbed or beaten – the NZ Police Association representing frontline staff provides the Pavlovian response. Arm the police, they ritually demand.

In turn this provokes the equally Pavlovian response of the police hierarchy, the government of the day and numerous academics: No. Their collective rationale is that the police, and the public, will be in greater danger if our frontline against the ferals and the nutters have Glocks strapped to their waists.

This week, Justice (and former police) Minister Judith Collins led the charge. The police already have liberalised gun regulations, she argued. They can take arms to any incident deemed likely.

Which rather misses the point. Police have no idea how any situation might escalate or de-escalate when they receive that initial call. The ones in which they are injured or killed, tend to start from some mundane pretext. Incidents are generally deemed not likely – and then all hell breaks loose, as it did in Dargaville this week or in the driveway of Napier drug dealer Jan Molenaar in 2009.

I don;t think it is good enough that the pistols and rifles are in lock boxes in police cars…when things escalate they?escalate?far faster than a police officer can run back to his car and unlock a box.

Liberal pantywaists have been arguing with me all week that arming the Police would have meant that an officer would be dead rather than shot at with his own taser. Michael Laws knows the real facts around that…armed Police get a much politer response from people than those unarmed or considered unarmed…the crims obviously consider Tasers to be no threat at all:

Read more »