United States Constitution

The Democrats’ poster boy supports anti-constitutional principles of Sharia law

PHILADELPHIA, PA - JULY 28: on the fourth day of the Democratic National Convention at the Wells Fargo Center, July 28, 2016 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton received the number of votes needed to secure the party's nomination. An estimated 50,000 people are expected in Philadelphia, including hundreds of protesters and members of the media. The four-day Democratic National Convention kicked off July 25. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Alex Wong/Getty Images

Khizr Khan, the poster boy for the Democrats believes that the Constitution ?Must always be subordinated to the Sharia.?

Notwithstanding his war-hero son?s genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M. Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over ?man-made? Western law ? including the very Constitution he championed in his Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald Trump.

…Khan speaks admiringly of Brohi?s interpretation of human rights, even though it included the right to kill and mutilate?those who violate Islamic laws and even the right of men to ?beat? wives who act ?unseemly.?

…Khan…praised his remarks even though Brohi advocated for the enforcement of the medieval Sharia punishments

…Of course, such cruel and unusual Sharia punishments, ranging from stonings and floggings to beheadings, would be a flagrant violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Western society is built on individualism and secularism, concepts enshrined in the Constitution. But Brohi scoffs at them, arguing, ?The individual has to be sacrificed. Collectivity has a special sanctity attached to it in Islam.? ? Read more »

NY Times uses their First Amendment rights to demand citizens have their Second Amendment rights removed

In a bizarre front page editorial the NY Times has demanded that politicians remove the Second Amendment rights of citizens.

They have claimed that the right to keep and bear arms is “a moral outrage and national disgrace”.

All decent people feel sorrow and righteous fury about the latest slaughter of innocents, in California. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are searching for motivations, including the vital question of how the murderers might have been connected to international terrorism. That is right and proper.

But motives do not matter to the dead in California, nor did they in Colorado, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia, Connecticut and far too many other places. The attention and anger of Americans should also be directed at the elected leaders whose job is to keep us safe but who place a higher premium on the money and political power of an industry dedicated to profiting from the unfettered spread of ever more powerful firearms.

Read more »

Gun Control actually increases Crime

Back in 2007 gun control was debated and ABC looked at the issue…nothing has changed that would affect this story other than the liberals are still trying to take the guns:

?ABC anchor John Stossel discussed the self-defensive benefits of gun ownership, debunking the myth that “gun control reduces crime.” The segment aired during 20/20’s recurring series, “Myths, Lies & Downright Stupidity,” based on Stossel’s book of the same title. Citing the recent Federal Appeals Court for DC ruling overturning Washington, D.C.’s ban on gun ownership, Stossel talked to the pro-gun plaintiff in the case, Tom Palmer, and pointed out that the murder rate in D.C. increased after the city’s gun ban: “Since Washington’s gun law passed, the murder rate actually increased, even while America’s murder rate dropped. It’s because guns can also save lives, says Palmer, as one saved his years ago in California.”

Of course people, especially Whangarei based teachers will fail to understand that guns can actually save lives. The vast majority of people killed in gun related homicide are criminals.? Read more »